Hello Mark,
On 10/17/2014 01:57 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 06:48:51PM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>
>> +- maxim,regulator-initial-mode: initial operating mode.
>> + This property can only be used on regulators that support changing their mode
>> + during normal operation. These regulators are LDO1, LDO3, LDO20 and LDO21.
>> +- maxim,regulator-disk-mode: operating mode for the regulator when the system
>> + enters in the Suspend-to-Disk state.
>> +- maxim,regulator-mem-mode: operating mode for the regulator when the system
>> + enters in the Suspend-to-RAM state.
>
> This seems pretty ugly since it's not integrated with the suspend state
> binding at all - adding new suspend modes is going to involve changing
> the binding which seems icky. Adding a standard property to set modes
> doesn't seem so bad, I think a translation function to parse device
> specific mode bindings in properties might be the way forwards.
>
Just to be sure I understood correctly, are you suggesting something like this?
ldo1_reg: LDO1 {
regulator-name = "vdd_1v0";
regulator-min-microvolt = <1000000>;
regulator-max-microvolt = <1000000>;
regulator-state-mem {
regulator-on-in-suspend;
regulator-mode = <MAX77802_OPMODE_LP>;
};
};
In other words, extending Chanwoo Choi's original suspend state binding to add
the regulator-mode property that was present in his v3 [0] but instead trying
to use the standard REGULATOR_MODE_*, say that each regulator driver should
define it's own device-specific set of modes and a do the translation to fill
standard modes in the struct regulation_constraints {initial,disk,mem} mode?
That way adding new suspend states, will only require changing the generic
regulator binding but not the regulator driver specific bindings.
Best regards,
Javier
[0]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/8/13/768
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
