On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 2:50 PM, Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 25.09.2014 09:49, Tomasz Figa wrote: >> On 25.09.2014 09:47, Linus Walleij wrote: >>> On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 9:05 PM, Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>>> This series intends to clean up data structures used by pinctrl-samsung driver. >>>> More specifically, it separates initial compile time constants from data used >>>> at runtime, allowing unused variant data to be dropped and selected structures >>>> constified to improve safety. >>> >>> I like the patch set, tried to apply it but patch 3/5 failed to apply to the >>> devel branch for pinctrl. >>> >>> Can you rebase this on my "devel" branch, include Marek's Tested-by >>> tag and resend, and I'll take it for v3.18. >> >> Sure. Will do that today evening. Probably clashed with some other >> changes queued in the meantime. > > Uhm. I went back home and forgot about this series until now. Sorry. > > I have rebased it on your "devel" branch, although it seems like this > branch is missing [1], which in turn seems to be already present in your > "for-next" branch and is going to cause a merge conflict with this > series. Should I still proceed with posting the series based on "devel"? > > [1] f6a8249f9e55d pinctrl: exynos: Lock GPIOs as interrupts when used as > EINTs Bah I must have accidentally applied the patch to my for-next branch instead of devel, and then wiped it out of existence when I later reset the for-next branch to devel. Please resend all 5 rebased on devel. Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |