Hi Linus, On 25.09.2014 09:49, Tomasz Figa wrote: > On 25.09.2014 09:47, Linus Walleij wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 9:05 PM, Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> This series intends to clean up data structures used by pinctrl-samsung driver. >>> More specifically, it separates initial compile time constants from data used >>> at runtime, allowing unused variant data to be dropped and selected structures >>> constified to improve safety. >> >> I like the patch set, tried to apply it but patch 3/5 failed to apply to the >> devel branch for pinctrl. >> >> Can you rebase this on my "devel" branch, include Marek's Tested-by >> tag and resend, and I'll take it for v3.18. > > Sure. Will do that today evening. Probably clashed with some other > changes queued in the meantime. Uhm. I went back home and forgot about this series until now. Sorry. I have rebased it on your "devel" branch, although it seems like this branch is missing [1], which in turn seems to be already present in your "for-next" branch and is going to cause a merge conflict with this series. Should I still proceed with posting the series based on "devel"? [1] f6a8249f9e55d pinctrl: exynos: Lock GPIOs as interrupts when used as EINTs Best regards, Tomasz -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |