> Doug posted a patch [0] to fix the issue you are reporting but it was not > picked. I tested that the patch applies on top of linux-next + the latest > cros_ec cleanups (that includes a patch for this i2c driver and was taken > by Lee. So I think is safe for you take Doug's patch through your tree > since it seems to not cause any conflict with the mfd tree. OK, thanks for the heads up. I picked it.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature