On 26/09/14 15:24, Tomasz Figa wrote: > I'm not concerned specifically with Exynos4210, but with placing such > kind of data in common dtsi files. > > Notice that even on boards which have correct initialization done by > firmware, this will cause the settings to be overwritten, even if the > firmware sets correct, but different values, regardless of them being > clock parents or rates. > > To me, even if this would mean duplicating some data, making this per > board and present only in dts files of boards that actually need this > (i.e. are known to have broken firmware) sounds more reasonable. OTOH by having those settings in device tree would ensure the clock tree is set correctly, regardless of the firmware. There is only one correct clock parent for these devices, so the kernel couldn't do any harm. I'd say it never worked in practice to rely on the bootloader to configure these things, and one could say the firmware has been broken in general with regards to this issue. -- Regards, Sylwester -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |