Dear Eduardo,
On 08/28/2014 11:53 PM, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 01:25:14PM +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
>> Dear Eduardo,
>>
>> This patch is wrong. It is my mistake.
>>
>> Please ignore only this patch because
>> the offset calculation of 'case 0' is different from 'case 2'.
>
>
> Do patches 1 - 3 are still correct? Patch 1, from Barlomiej, seams to be
> a common agreement.
Yes, patches 1 - 3 are correct.
Best Regards,
Chanwoo Choi
>
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> Chanwoo Choi
>>
>> On 08/26/2014 10:31 AM, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
>>> This patch remove simply duplicate code when reading triminfo register of Exynos5440.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Acked-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> Cc: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> Cc: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Reviewed-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c | 4 +---
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
>>> index 64c702a..5888467 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
>>> @@ -187,15 +187,13 @@ static int exynos_tmu_initialize(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>> */
>>> switch (data->id) {
>>> case 0:
>>> + case 2:
>>> trim_info = readl(data->base +
>>> EXYNOS5440_EFUSE_SWAP_OFFSET + reg->triminfo_data);
>>> break;
>>> case 1:
>>> trim_info = readl(data->base + reg->triminfo_data);
>>> break;
>>> - case 2:
>>> - trim_info = readl(data->base -
>>> - EXYNOS5440_EFUSE_SWAP_OFFSET + reg->triminfo_data);
>>> }
>>> } else {
>>> /* On exynos5420 the triminfo register is in the shared space */
>>>
>>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
