On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 01:25:14PM +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> Dear Eduardo,
>
> This patch is wrong. It is my mistake.
>
> Please ignore only this patch because
> the offset calculation of 'case 0' is different from 'case 2'.
Do patches 1 - 3 are still correct? Patch 1, from Barlomiej, seams to be
a common agreement.
>
> Best Regards,
> Chanwoo Choi
>
> On 08/26/2014 10:31 AM, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> > This patch remove simply duplicate code when reading triminfo register of Exynos5440.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Acked-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Reviewed-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c | 4 +---
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
> > index 64c702a..5888467 100644
> > --- a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
> > +++ b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
> > @@ -187,15 +187,13 @@ static int exynos_tmu_initialize(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > */
> > switch (data->id) {
> > case 0:
> > + case 2:
> > trim_info = readl(data->base +
> > EXYNOS5440_EFUSE_SWAP_OFFSET + reg->triminfo_data);
> > break;
> > case 1:
> > trim_info = readl(data->base + reg->triminfo_data);
> > break;
> > - case 2:
> > - trim_info = readl(data->base -
> > - EXYNOS5440_EFUSE_SWAP_OFFSET + reg->triminfo_data);
> > }
> > } else {
> > /* On exynos5420 the triminfo register is in the shared space */
> >
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
