On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 06:19:00PM +0100, Olof Johansson wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 10:03 AM, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 05:28:22PM +0100, Olof Johansson wrote:
> >> On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 2:48 AM, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> >> > + cpus {
> >> >> > + #address-cells = <2>;
> >> >> > + #size-cells = <0>;
> >> >>
> >> >> Why size-cells=2? Can you not fit a cpuid in 32 bits?
> >> >
> >> > As of commit 72aea393a2e7 (arm64: smp: honour #address-size when parsing
> >> > CPU reg property) Linux can handle single-cell cpu node reg entries
> >> > where /cpus/#address-cells = <1>.
> >> >
> >> > I can't make any guarantees about other code (e.g. bootloaders) which
> >> > might try to do things with cpu nodes, YMMV.
> >>
> >> Ok. If address-cells is kept at 2 the unit address needs to be changed
> >> to "0,0". So one or the other has to be changed.
> >
> > I'm happy either way.
> >
> > I'm not sure the rest of the tree had "0," prefixes on all of the
> > unit-addresses for 64-bit addresses that were under 4GB, and I'm not
> > sure that existing dts consistently do that either.
> >
> > Do we want to enforce that for all 64-bit unit-addresses?
>
> Yeah, I believe that's the only valid format for a 2-address-cell unit address.
Fair enough. I didn't spot this explicitly mentioned anywhere in ePAPR,
but the examples match.
I should probably re-jig that checkpatch test I had for unit-addresses.
> >> > [...]
> >> >
> >> >> > + hsi2c_2: hsi2c@14E60000 {
> >> >>
> >> >> I much prefer lowercase hex in unit addresses (and reg entries) below. I
> >> >> know 32-bit uses uppercase, but let's switch going forward here.
> >> >
> >> > My preference also; I'm happy to enforce that on new dts.
> >> >
> >> > [...]
> >> >
> >> >> > + timer {
> >> >> > + compatible = "arm,armv8-timer";
> >> >> > + interrupts = <1 13 0xff01>,
> >> >> > + <1 14 0xff01>,
> >> >> > + <1 11 0xff01>,
> >> >> > + <1 10 0xff01>;
> >> >> > + clock-frequency = <24000000>;
> >> >> > + use-clocksource-only;
> >> >> > + use-physical-timer;
> >> >>
> >> >> These two properties are not standard, and I would expect any 64-bit
> >> >> platform to come with PSCI such that you have a way to initialize the
> >> >> virtual timers.
> >> >
> >> > Likewise with clock-frequency. It's not a full workaround, and it's not
> >> > hard to initialise CNTFRQ on each CPU.
> >>
> >> Technically clock-frequency is documented, but not recommended to be
> >> used unless needed for working around firmware that doesn't setup the
> >> register value. :)
> >
> > True.
> >
> >> In this case it's likely a cargo cult carry over from 5250 where the
> >> CNTFRQ requirement happened around the same time as we were working on
> >> it so that generation firmware lacked support for it -- it should
> >> since then have been fixed properly.
> >
> > It's probably unhelpful that the documentation isn't explicit about
> > that. On that front, how about the patch below?
> >
> > Mark.
> >
> > ---->8----
> > From 67104ad5a56e4c18f9c41f06af028b7561740afd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>
> > Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 17:41:03 +0100
> > Subject: [PATCH] Doc: dt: arch_timer: discourage clock-frequency use
> >
> > The ARM Generic Timer (AKA the architected timer, arm_arch_timer)
> > features a CPU register (CNTFRQ) which firmware is intended to
> > initialize, and non-secure software can read to determine the frequency
> > of the timer. On CPUs with secure state, this register cannot be written
> > from non-secure states.
> >
> > The firmware of early SoCs featuring the timer did not correctly
> > initialize CNTFRQ correctly on all CPUs, requiring the frequency to be
> > described in DT as a workaround. This workaround is not complete however
> > as CNTFRQ is exposed to all software in a privileged non-secure mode,
> > including KVM guests. The firmware and DTs for recent SoCs have followed
> > the example set by these early SoCs.
> >
> > This patch updates the arch timer binding documentation to make it
> > clearer that the use of the clock-frequency property is a poor
> > work-around. The MMIO generic timer binding is similarly updated, though
> > this is less of a concern as there is generally no need to expose the
> > MMIO timers to guest OSs.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx>
>
> With caps fixed:
>
> Acked-by: Olof Johansson <olof@xxxxxxxxx>
Cheers.
> > ---
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arch_timer.txt | 8 ++++++--
> > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arch_timer.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arch_timer.txt
> > index 37b2caf..5ca3f95 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arch_timer.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arch_timer.txt
> > @@ -17,7 +17,10 @@ to deliver its interrupts via SPIs.
> > - interrupts : Interrupt list for secure, non-secure, virtual and
> > hypervisor timers, in that order.
> >
> > -- clock-frequency : The frequency of the main counter, in Hz. Optional.
> > +- clock-frequency : The frequency of the main counter, in Hz. Should be present
> > + only where necessary to work around BROKEN firmware which does not configure
>
> No need to do broken in all caps. In reality I don't expect it to make
> a difference on people complying or not. :)
Sure. I'll save the caps for replies to violators ;)
Mark.
> > + CNTFRQ on all CPUs to a uniform correct value. Use of this property is
> > + STRONGLY DISCOURAGED; fix your firmware unless absolutely impossible.
>
> Same here.
>
> >
> > - always-on : a boolean property. If present, the timer is powered through an
> > always-on power domain, therefore it never loses context.
> > @@ -38,7 +41,8 @@ Example:
> >
> > - compatible : Should at least contain "arm,armv7-timer-mem".
> >
> > -- clock-frequency : The frequency of the main counter, in Hz. Optional.
> > +- clock-frequency : The frequency of the main counter, in Hz. Should be present
> > + only when firmware has not configured the MMIO CNTFRQ registers.
> >
> > - reg : The control frame base address.
> >
> > --
> > 1.9.1
> >
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
