[PATCH v2 01/17] drm/exynos/ipp: remove fake pm callbacks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



PM callbacks in ipp core do nothing, so the patch removes it.

Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Joonyoung Shim <jy0922.shim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_ipp.c | 51 ---------------------------------
 1 file changed, 51 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_ipp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_ipp.c
index c411399..da917ca 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_ipp.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_ipp.c
@@ -1808,63 +1808,12 @@ static int ipp_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static int ipp_power_ctrl(struct ipp_context *ctx, bool enable)
-{
-	DRM_DEBUG_KMS("enable[%d]\n", enable);
-
-	return 0;
-}
-
-#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
-static int ipp_suspend(struct device *dev)
-{
-	struct ipp_context *ctx = get_ipp_context(dev);
-
-	if (pm_runtime_suspended(dev))
-		return 0;
-
-	return ipp_power_ctrl(ctx, false);
-}
-
-static int ipp_resume(struct device *dev)
-{
-	struct ipp_context *ctx = get_ipp_context(dev);
-
-	if (!pm_runtime_suspended(dev))
-		return ipp_power_ctrl(ctx, true);
-
-	return 0;
-}
-#endif
-
-#ifdef CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME
-static int ipp_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
-{
-	struct ipp_context *ctx = get_ipp_context(dev);
-
-	return ipp_power_ctrl(ctx, false);
-}
-
-static int ipp_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
-{
-	struct ipp_context *ctx = get_ipp_context(dev);
-
-	return ipp_power_ctrl(ctx, true);
-}
-#endif
-
-static const struct dev_pm_ops ipp_pm_ops = {
-	SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(ipp_suspend, ipp_resume)
-	SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS(ipp_runtime_suspend, ipp_runtime_resume, NULL)
-};
-
 struct platform_driver ipp_driver = {
 	.probe		= ipp_probe,
 	.remove		= ipp_remove,
 	.driver		= {
 		.name	= "exynos-drm-ipp",
 		.owner	= THIS_MODULE,
-		.pm	= &ipp_pm_ops,
 	},
 };
 
-- 
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux SoC Development]     [Linux Rockchip Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux