On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 4:17 PM, Andreas Färber <afaerber@xxxxxxx> wrote: > Am 25.07.2014 21:44, schrieb Ajay Kumar: >> Add DT nodes for ptn3460 bridge chip and panel-simple panel. > > "simple-panel" Ok. >> Add backlight enable pin and backlight power supply for pwm-backlight. >> Also add bridge phandle needed by dp to enable display on snow. >> >> Signed-off-by: Ajay Kumar <ajaykumar.rs@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-snow.dts | 40 +++++++++++++++++---------------- >> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-snow.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-snow.dts >> index 6c36d41..f57f993 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-snow.dts >> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-snow.dts >> @@ -270,7 +270,7 @@ >> dcdc3 { >> ti,enable-ext-control; >> }; >> - fet1 { >> + fet1: fet1 { >> regulator-name = "vcd_led"; >> ti,overcurrent-wait = <3>; >> }; >> @@ -293,7 +293,7 @@ >> regulator-always-on; >> ti,overcurrent-wait = <3>; >> }; >> - fet6 { >> + fet6: fet6 { >> regulator-name = "lcd_vdd"; >> ti,overcurrent-wait = <3>; >> }; >> @@ -342,6 +342,15 @@ >> pinctrl-0 = <&max98095_en>; >> pinctrl-names = "default"; >> }; >> + >> + ptn3460: ptn3460-bridge@20 { > > "lvds-bridge"? (AF) Ok. >> + compatible = "nxp,ptn3460"; >> + reg = <0x20>; >> + powerdown-gpios = <&gpy2 5 0>; >> + reset-gpios = <&gpx1 5 0>; >> + edid-emulation = <5>; >> + panel = <&panel>; >> + }; >> }; >> >> i2s0: i2s@03830000 { >> @@ -389,11 +398,13 @@ >> vdd_pll-supply = <&ldo8_reg>; >> }; >> >> - backlight { >> + backlight: backlight { >> compatible = "pwm-backlight"; >> pwms = <&pwm 0 1000000 0>; >> brightness-levels = <0 100 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 2800>; >> default-brightness-level = <7>; >> + enable-gpios = <&gpx3 0 0>; >> + power-supply = <&fet1>; >> pinctrl-0 = <&pwm0_out>; >> pinctrl-names = "default"; >> }; >> @@ -403,6 +414,12 @@ >> samsung,invert-vclk; >> }; >> >> + panel: panel-simple { > > Just "panel"? (AF) > >> + compatible = "simple-panel"; > > Use something more concrete than "simple-panel"? (Thierry) Right. >> + power-supply = <&fet6>; >> + backlight = <&backlight>; >> + }; >> + >> dp-controller@145B0000 { >> status = "okay"; >> pinctrl-names = "default"; >> @@ -414,21 +431,6 @@ >> samsung,link-rate = <0x0a>; >> samsung,lane-count = <2>; >> samsung,hpd-gpio = <&gpx0 7 0>; >> - >> - display-timings { >> - native-mode = <&timing1>; >> - >> - timing1: timing@1 { >> - clock-frequency = <70589280>; >> - hactive = <1366>; >> - vactive = <768>; >> - hfront-porch = <40>; >> - hback-porch = <40>; >> - hsync-len = <32>; >> - vback-porch = <10>; >> - vfront-porch = <12>; >> - vsync-len = <6>; >> - }; >> - }; >> + bridge = <&ptn3460>; >> }; >> }; > > This patch will trivially conflict with my Snow cleanup [1]; ptn3460 > would go into the appropriate &i2c_* and this hunk into &dp then. Yes, display-timings node should be removed from the DP DT node. Should I rebase these DT patches on top of your cleanup series? Ajay -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html