On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 6:48 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas
<javier.martinez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Currently after configuring a GPIO pin as an interrupt related pinmux
> registers are changed, but there is no protection from calling
> gpio_direction_*() in a badly written driver, which would cause the same
> pinmux register to be reconfigured for regular input/output and this
> disabling interrupt capability of the pin.
>
> This patch addresses this issue by moving pinmux reconfiguration to
> .irq_{request,release}_resources() callback of irq_chip and calling
> gpio_lock_as_irq() helper to prevent reconfiguration of pin direction.
>
> Setting up a GPIO interrupt on Samsung SoCs is a two-step operation -
> in addition to trigger configuration in a dedicated register, the pinmux
> must be also reconfigured to GPIO interrupt, which is a different function
> than normal GPIO input, although I/O-wise they both behave in the same way
> and gpio_get_value() can be used on a pin configured as IRQ as well.
>
> Such design implies subtleties such as gpio_direction_input() not having
> to fail if a pin is already configured as an interrupt nor change the
> configuration to normal input. But the FLAG_USED_AS_IRQ set in gpiolib by
> gpio_lock_as_irq() is only used to check that gpio_direction_output() is
> not called, it's not used to prevent gpio_direction_input() to be called.
> So this is not a complete solution for Samsung SoCs but it's definitely a
> move in the right direction.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> [javier: use request resources instead of startup and expand commit message]
> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
OK patch applied for fixes, sorry for missing to follow up on this.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
