Hi Tomasz and Bartlomiej, On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 4:52 PM, Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 18.08.2014 13:02, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: >> On Thursday, August 14, 2014 08:07:40 PM Vivek Gautam wrote: >>> On Thursday, August 14, 2014 7:55 PM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz >>> <b.zolnierkie@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote >> >>> There's one thing that I would want to comment here, since we don't have any >>> new usb-phy driver for S3C64XX, >>> so we can't simply remove this entire driver. >>> I have posted my patch-series [1], which does cleanup while keeping the >>> support for S3C64XX. >> >> AFAIK S3C64XX code from drivers/usb/phy/phy-samsung-usb2.c has >> never been used as this platform still uses its own code from >> arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/setup-usb-phy.c (there are no users in >> the kernel tree of either s3c64xx-usb2phy platform device or >> "samsung,s3c64xx-usb2phy" DT compatible) . Therefore I think >> that the entire drivers/usb/phy/phy-samsung-usb2.c driver >> should be removed (somebody with the hardware can as well add >> S3C64XX support to the new drivers/phy/phy-samsung-usb2.c >> driver and port the platform to use it). >> > > I agree with removal of this driver. As Bart said, it is not used for > S3C64xx at all. The platform was supposed to be moved to this driver, > but that never happened. In fact, I already have a patch adding support > for S3C64xx to the new driver. Cool then, lets remove this driver completely and use the new generic PHY based driver once that comes (from Tomasz). I shall drop the patches for cleaning up the usb-phy drivers from my series. -- Best Regards Vivek Gautam Samsung R&D Institute, Bangalore India -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |