Daniel Lezcano wrote: > > On 07/20/2014 12:06 AM, Olof Johansson wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 09:52:52AM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote: > >> Note that this is also based on 3.16-rc5 because of dependency with > >> previous samsung fixes including exynos_mct already merged in > >> mainline during -rc. > >> > >> The following changes since commit 1795cd9b3a91d4b5473c97f491d63892442212ab: > >> > >> Linux 3.16-rc5 (2014-07-13 14:04:33 -0700) > >> > >> are available in the git repository at: > >> > > > >> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kgene/linux-samsung.git > >> tags/exynos-mct > >> > >> for you to fetch changes up to 1a631118c1d085fe162f3b6d44f710c72206ef2d: > >> > >> clocksource: exynos_mct: Only use 32-bits where possible > >> (2014-07-19 03:07:52 +0900) > >> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------- > >> exynos_mct update for v3.17 > >> - only use 32-bit access for performance benefits on exynos > >> 32-bit system and this means ARCH timer should be supported > >> on exynos 64-bit system instead of current MCT. > >> - use readl_relaxed/writel_relaxed to consistently use the > >> proper functions in exynos_mct. > > > > There's no reason for these to go through arm-soc, is there? They should > > go through the clocksource tree (Daniel Lezcano / Thomas Gleixner). They > > also lack acks from them if they for some reason need to go through arm-soc. > Olof, you're right. The branch has no dependency with arm-soc so I agreed. > Yes, that's right. Furthermore I have been discussing with Doug about > these patches before. > > Kukjin, is there any dependency on these patches ? > Yeah, Daniel, it should be handled in the clocksource tree so how should I do for it? Thanks, Kukjin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |