On 07/20/2014 12:06 AM, Olof Johansson wrote:
On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 09:52:52AM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote:
Note that this is also based on 3.16-rc5 because of dependency with
previous samsung fixes including exynos_mct already merged in
mainline during -rc.
The following changes since commit 1795cd9b3a91d4b5473c97f491d63892442212ab:
Linux 3.16-rc5 (2014-07-13 14:04:33 -0700)
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kgene/linux-samsung.git
tags/exynos-mct
for you to fetch changes up to 1a631118c1d085fe162f3b6d44f710c72206ef2d:
clocksource: exynos_mct: Only use 32-bits where possible
(2014-07-19 03:07:52 +0900)
----------------------------------------------------------------
exynos_mct update for v3.17
- only use 32-bit access for performance benefits on exynos
32-bit system and this means ARCH timer should be supported
on exynos 64-bit system instead of current MCT.
- use readl_relaxed/writel_relaxed to consistently use the
proper functions in exynos_mct.
There's no reason for these to go through arm-soc, is there? They should
go through the clocksource tree (Daniel Lezcano / Thomas Gleixner). They
also lack acks from them if they for some reason need to go through arm-soc.
Yes, that's right. Furthermore I have been discussing with Doug about
these patches before.
Kukjin, is there any dependency on these patches ?
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
