Re: [PATCH 08/10] mfd: cros_ec: cleanup: Remove EC wrapper functions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Doug,

On 17 June 2014 21:27, Doug Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Simon,
>
> On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 8:42 PM, Simon Glass <sjg@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> diff --git a/drivers/input/keyboard/cros_ec_keyb.c b/drivers/input/keyboard/cros_ec_keyb.c
>>> index 4083796..dc37b6b 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/input/keyboard/cros_ec_keyb.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/input/keyboard/cros_ec_keyb.c
>>> @@ -191,8 +191,18 @@ static void cros_ec_keyb_close(struct input_dev *dev)
>>>
>>>  static int cros_ec_keyb_get_state(struct cros_ec_keyb *ckdev, uint8_t *kb_state)
>>>  {
>>> -       return ckdev->ec->command_recv(ckdev->ec, EC_CMD_MKBP_STATE,
>>> -                                         kb_state, ckdev->cols);
>>> +       int ret;
>>> +       struct cros_ec_command msg = {
>>> +               .version = 0,
>>> +               .command = EC_CMD_MKBP_STATE,
>>> +               .outdata = NULL,
>>> +               .outsize = 0,
>>> +               .indata = kb_state,
>>> +               .insize = ckdev->cols,
>>> +       };
>>> +
>>> +       ret = ckdev->ec->cmd_xfer(ckdev->ec, &msg);
>>
>> Do we need ret?
>
> No.  If you wish I will spin without it.  Let me know.
>
> Note that locally this code includes a comment between the above and the return:
>   /* FIXME: This assumes msg.result == EC_RES_SUCCESS */

It's not important to me, and you've explained the other question.

Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux SoC Development]     [Linux Rockchip Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux