Hi Doug, On 16 June 2014 14:39, Doug Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > From: Bill Richardson <wfrichar@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Remove the three wrapper functions that talk to the EC without passing all > the desired arguments and just use the underlying communication function > that passes everything in a struct intead. > > This is internal code refactoring only. Nothing should change. > > Signed-off-by: Bill Richardson <wfrichar@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-cros-ec-tunnel.c | 15 +++++++++++---- > drivers/input/keyboard/cros_ec_keyb.c | 14 ++++++++++++-- > drivers/mfd/cros_ec.c | 32 -------------------------------- > include/linux/mfd/cros_ec.h | 19 ++++++------------- > 4 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-cros-ec-tunnel.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-cros-ec-tunnel.c > index 8e7a714..dd07818 100644 > --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-cros-ec-tunnel.c > +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-cros-ec-tunnel.c > @@ -183,6 +183,7 @@ static int ec_i2c_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adap, struct i2c_msg i2c_msgs[], > u8 *request = NULL; > u8 *response = NULL; > int result; > + struct cros_ec_command msg; > > request_len = ec_i2c_count_message(i2c_msgs, num); > if (request_len < 0) { > @@ -218,9 +219,15 @@ static int ec_i2c_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adap, struct i2c_msg i2c_msgs[], > } > > ec_i2c_construct_message(request, i2c_msgs, num, bus_num); > - result = bus->ec->command_sendrecv(bus->ec, EC_CMD_I2C_PASSTHRU, > - request, request_len, > - response, response_len); > + > + msg.version = 0; > + msg.command = EC_CMD_I2C_PASSTHRU; > + msg.outdata = request; > + msg.outsize = request_len; > + msg.indata = response; > + msg.insize = response_len; > + > + result = bus->ec->cmd_xfer(bus->ec, &msg); > if (result) > goto exit; > > @@ -258,7 +265,7 @@ static int ec_i2c_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > u32 remote_bus; > int err; > > - if (!ec->command_sendrecv) { > + if (!ec->cmd_xfer) { > dev_err(dev, "Missing sendrecv\n"); > return -EINVAL; > } > diff --git a/drivers/input/keyboard/cros_ec_keyb.c b/drivers/input/keyboard/cros_ec_keyb.c > index 4083796..dc37b6b 100644 > --- a/drivers/input/keyboard/cros_ec_keyb.c > +++ b/drivers/input/keyboard/cros_ec_keyb.c > @@ -191,8 +191,18 @@ static void cros_ec_keyb_close(struct input_dev *dev) > > static int cros_ec_keyb_get_state(struct cros_ec_keyb *ckdev, uint8_t *kb_state) > { > - return ckdev->ec->command_recv(ckdev->ec, EC_CMD_MKBP_STATE, > - kb_state, ckdev->cols); > + int ret; > + struct cros_ec_command msg = { > + .version = 0, > + .command = EC_CMD_MKBP_STATE, > + .outdata = NULL, > + .outsize = 0, > + .indata = kb_state, > + .insize = ckdev->cols, > + }; > + > + ret = ckdev->ec->cmd_xfer(ckdev->ec, &msg); Do we need ret? > + return ret; > } > > static int cros_ec_keyb_work(struct notifier_block *nb, > diff --git a/drivers/mfd/cros_ec.c b/drivers/mfd/cros_ec.c > index d242714..6dd91e9 100644 > --- a/drivers/mfd/cros_ec.c > +++ b/drivers/mfd/cros_ec.c > @@ -44,34 +44,6 @@ int cros_ec_prepare_tx(struct cros_ec_device *ec_dev, > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL(cros_ec_prepare_tx); > > -static int cros_ec_command_sendrecv(struct cros_ec_device *ec_dev, > - uint16_t cmd, void *out_buf, int out_len, > - void *in_buf, int in_len) > -{ > - struct cros_ec_command msg; > - > - msg.version = cmd >> 8; > - msg.command = cmd & 0xff; > - msg.outdata = out_buf; > - msg.outsize = out_len; > - msg.indata = in_buf; > - msg.insize = in_len; > - > - return ec_dev->cmd_xfer(ec_dev, &msg); > -} > - > -static int cros_ec_command_recv(struct cros_ec_device *ec_dev, > - uint16_t cmd, void *buf, int buf_len) > -{ > - return cros_ec_command_sendrecv(ec_dev, cmd, NULL, 0, buf, buf_len); > -} > - > -static int cros_ec_command_send(struct cros_ec_device *ec_dev, > - uint16_t cmd, void *buf, int buf_len) > -{ > - return cros_ec_command_sendrecv(ec_dev, cmd, buf, buf_len, NULL, 0); > -} > - > static irqreturn_t ec_irq_thread(int irq, void *data) > { > struct cros_ec_device *ec_dev = data; > @@ -104,10 +76,6 @@ int cros_ec_register(struct cros_ec_device *ec_dev) > > BLOCKING_INIT_NOTIFIER_HEAD(&ec_dev->event_notifier); > > - ec_dev->command_send = cros_ec_command_send; > - ec_dev->command_recv = cros_ec_command_recv; > - ec_dev->command_sendrecv = cros_ec_command_sendrecv; > - > if (ec_dev->din_size) { > ec_dev->din = devm_kzalloc(dev, ec_dev->din_size, GFP_KERNEL); > if (!ec_dev->din) > diff --git a/include/linux/mfd/cros_ec.h b/include/linux/mfd/cros_ec.h > index 2b0c598..60c0880 100644 > --- a/include/linux/mfd/cros_ec.h > +++ b/include/linux/mfd/cros_ec.h > @@ -63,9 +63,10 @@ struct cros_ec_command { > * @was_wake_device: true if this device was set to wake the system from > * sleep at the last suspend > * @event_notifier: interrupt event notifier for transport devices > - * @command_send: send a command > - * @command_recv: receive a response > - * @command_sendrecv: send a command and receive a response > + * @cmd_xfer: send command to EC and get response > + * Returns 0 if the communication succeeded, but that doesn't mean the EC > + * was happy with the command it got. Caller should check msg.result for > + * the EC's result code. > * > * @priv: Private data > * @irq: Interrupt to use > @@ -83,7 +84,6 @@ struct cros_ec_command { > * @parent: pointer to parent device (e.g. i2c or spi device) > * @wake_enabled: true if this device can wake the system from sleep > * @lock: one transaction at a time > - * @cmd_xfer: low-level channel to the EC > */ > struct cros_ec_device { > > @@ -94,13 +94,8 @@ struct cros_ec_device { > bool was_wake_device; > struct class *cros_class; > struct blocking_notifier_head event_notifier; > - int (*command_send)(struct cros_ec_device *ec, > - uint16_t cmd, void *out_buf, int out_len); > - int (*command_recv)(struct cros_ec_device *ec, > - uint16_t cmd, void *in_buf, int in_len); > - int (*command_sendrecv)(struct cros_ec_device *ec, > - uint16_t cmd, void *out_buf, int out_len, > - void *in_buf, int in_len); > + int (*cmd_xfer)(struct cros_ec_device *ec, > + struct cros_ec_command *msg); > > /* These are used to implement the platform-specific interface */ > void *priv; > @@ -112,8 +107,6 @@ struct cros_ec_device { > struct device *parent; > bool wake_enabled; > struct mutex lock; > - int (*cmd_xfer)(struct cros_ec_device *ec, > - struct cros_ec_command *msg); Seems odd - maybe this line move of cmd_xfer() should be in an earlier patch? Regards, Simon -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html