On 16/06/14 13:43, Tushar Behera wrote: > On 06/09/2014 04:36 PM, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote: >> > On 09/06/14 12:44, Tushar Behera wrote: >>> >> IMHO, the clock entries belong here as the audss clock provider >>> >> essentially remains same for all Exynos4 based systems. >>> >> >>> >> As for pin-control entry, I believe we can move them to respective SoC >>> >> dtsi files. >>> >> >>> >> Does that sound okay to you? >> > >> > I guess that's fine, I tend to agree with you about the clocks. >> > > As I was going ahead with the implementation, it felt like repetition > with the same code. Would it be acceptable to you if we go ahead with > the earlier approach of adding both clock and pin-control entry to > exynos4.dtsi? > > I can see i2c_n and spi_n adding pin-control entries in exynos4.dtsi itself. OK, I don't mind, I'll leave it up to the maintainers. -- Regards, Sylwester -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |