Hello Javier, On 12 June 2014 19:36, Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hello Naveen, > > On 06/12/2014 03:13 PM, Naveen Krishna Chatradhi wrote: >> Use controller_data structure only for the Non Device tree platforms. >> For Device tree platforms, always derive the chipselect info from >> DT node. >> >> Signed-off-by: Naveen Krishna Chatradhi <ch.naveen@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: Doug Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c | 11 ++++++----- >> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c b/drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c >> index b888c66..f27e15d 100644 >> --- a/drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c >> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c >> @@ -795,14 +795,15 @@ static int s3c64xx_spi_setup(struct spi_device *spi) >> int err; >> >> sdd = spi_master_get_devdata(spi->master); >> - if (!cs && spi->dev.of_node) { >> + if (spi->dev.of_node) { >> cs = s3c64xx_get_slave_ctrldata(spi); >> spi->controller_data = cs; >> - } >> - >> - /* For the non-DT platforms derive chip selects from controller data */ >> - if (!spi->dev.of_node) >> + } else { >> + /* For the non-DT platforms derive chip >> + * selects from controller data >> + */ >> spi->cs_gpio = cs->line; >> + } >> >> if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(cs)) { >> dev_err(&spi->dev, "No CS for SPI(%d)\n", spi->chip_select); >> > > Personally I wouldn't have this change as a separate patch since it's too > related to what you changed in Patch 1. But it's just a nitpick. Patch 1/3 seems to be crowded with multiple changes. Thought, this would keep the changes cleaner. > > Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Thanks > > Best regards, > Javier -- Shine bright, (: Nav :) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html