Hello Naveen,
On 06/12/2014 03:13 PM, Naveen Krishna Chatradhi wrote:
> Use controller_data structure only for the Non Device tree platforms.
> For Device tree platforms, always derive the chipselect info from
> DT node.
>
> Signed-off-by: Naveen Krishna Chatradhi <ch.naveen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Doug Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c | 11 ++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c b/drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c
> index b888c66..f27e15d 100644
> --- a/drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c
> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c
> @@ -795,14 +795,15 @@ static int s3c64xx_spi_setup(struct spi_device *spi)
> int err;
>
> sdd = spi_master_get_devdata(spi->master);
> - if (!cs && spi->dev.of_node) {
> + if (spi->dev.of_node) {
> cs = s3c64xx_get_slave_ctrldata(spi);
> spi->controller_data = cs;
> - }
> -
> - /* For the non-DT platforms derive chip selects from controller data */
> - if (!spi->dev.of_node)
> + } else {
> + /* For the non-DT platforms derive chip
> + * selects from controller data
> + */
> spi->cs_gpio = cs->line;
> + }
>
> if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(cs)) {
> dev_err(&spi->dev, "No CS for SPI(%d)\n", spi->chip_select);
>
Personally I wouldn't have this change as a separate patch since it's too
related to what you changed in Patch 1. But it's just a nitpick.
Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Best regards,
Javier
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
