On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 10:59:43AM +0200, Lucas Stach wrote: > Hi Bjorn, > > just a friendly reminder. It would be nice if you could pull those in. > > Shawn already pulled the DT change and as it is a binding change this > means PCIe on i.MX6 is broken in -next, as long as the remaining patches > are missing. I applied these to pci/host-imx6 for v3.16. Sorry I didn't do this sooner; I get a lot of email and it's easy to overlook things. I mostly work from patchwork (http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-pci/list/?order=date), and I had dropped this series from there because there was enough discussion that I expected a re-post, so it wasn't on my radar screen anymore. Bjorn > Am Dienstag, den 29.04.2014, 14:31 +0200 schrieb Lucas Stach: > > Hi Bjorn, > > > > Am Freitag, den 25.04.2014, 08:39 -0600 schrieb Bjorn Helgaas: > > [...] > > > >> > PCI: designware: split Exynos and i.MX bindings > > > >> > ARM: dts: imx6: update pcie to bring in line with new binding > > > >> > PCI: imx6: use new clock names > > > >> > PCI: imx6: drop old irq mapping > > > >> > PCI: imx6: rip out optional (and unused) irqs > > > >> > PCI: designware: make MSI isr shared irq aware > > > >> > PCI: imx6: add support for MSI > > > >> > > > >> What's the status of all these? I would normally apply patches 4-8 of this > > > >> series through my tree, given the appropriate acks, but I haven't seen > > > >> those yet. And I'm not sure what dependencies there are between the > > > >> non-PCI patches and the PCI ones. > > > >> > > > > It's a complete binding change, so applying one part without the other > > > > is going to horribly break things. > > > > > > > > So I would at least want to see an ack for the binding change on the > > > > i.MX side from Shawn and Richard. This will need some follow on patches, > > > > as some boards adding PCIe using the old binding have cropped up in > > > > linux-next, but I can do the patches on short notice if everyone agrees > > > > to merge this patchset. > > > > > > > > The designware part is pretty simple and doesn't change anything for > > > > other users than i.MX. Though I would like to see an ack from Jingoo for > > > > those. > > > > > > > > I have some more stuff in the pipes regarding multiple MSI irqs, that > > > > depend on this series and also the Keystone people are waiting for this > > > > to be applied in order to consolidate the clock handling of the > > > > designware core driver, so it would be nice to get this moving again. > > > > > > OK, just poke me again when you're ready for me to do something with these. > > > > > > > As both Richard and Jingoo gave their ack for the respective patches I > > think this is good to go in and I would expect all the PCI patches to go > > through your tree for 3.16. > > > > Shawn, if you are not okay with this change, please speak up now. > > Otherwise please pick the dts change for 3.16. I'll go over linux-next > > and prepare the patches to fix up the boards there. > > > > > -- > Pengutronix e.K. | Lucas Stach | > Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |