On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 4:21 AM, Lucas Stach <l.stach@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Am Donnerstag, den 24.04.2014, 11:58 -0600 schrieb Bjorn Helgaas: >> On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 05:52:51PM +0100, Lucas Stach wrote: >> > While working on MSI support for the i.MX6 PCIe host driver >> > it has been discovered that the binding for this host controller >> > is broken in many ways (refer to the patch descriptions for more >> > info) and was introduced without proper discussion about what >> > should/should not be in the binding. >> > >> > This series fixes this and minimizes the difference of the >> > i.MX6 binding to the common designware PCIe binding. I'm aware >> > that this is a quite radical change, but I think it's justified >> > to do this as long as there aren't many user of the old binding >> > (most of the optional properties in the binding aren't even >> > implemented). >> > >> > Looking forward to your feedback. >> > >> > Lucas Stach (8): >> > ARM: imx6q-clk: parent lvds_gate from lvds_sel > This one is already applied. > >> > PCI: designware: split Exynos and i.MX bindings >> > ARM: dts: imx6: update pcie to bring in line with new binding >> > PCI: imx6: use new clock names >> > PCI: imx6: drop old irq mapping >> > PCI: imx6: rip out optional (and unused) irqs >> > PCI: designware: make MSI isr shared irq aware >> > PCI: imx6: add support for MSI >> >> What's the status of all these? I would normally apply patches 4-8 of this >> series through my tree, given the appropriate acks, but I haven't seen >> those yet. And I'm not sure what dependencies there are between the >> non-PCI patches and the PCI ones. >> > It's a complete binding change, so applying one part without the other > is going to horribly break things. > > So I would at least want to see an ack for the binding change on the > i.MX side from Shawn and Richard. This will need some follow on patches, > as some boards adding PCIe using the old binding have cropped up in > linux-next, but I can do the patches on short notice if everyone agrees > to merge this patchset. > > The designware part is pretty simple and doesn't change anything for > other users than i.MX. Though I would like to see an ack from Jingoo for > those. > > I have some more stuff in the pipes regarding multiple MSI irqs, that > depend on this series and also the Keystone people are waiting for this > to be applied in order to consolidate the clock handling of the > designware core driver, so it would be nice to get this moving again. OK, just poke me again when you're ready for me to do something with these. Bjorn -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |