On Fri, 25 Apr 2014, Vivek Gautam wrote:
> From: Kamil Debski <k.debski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Add the phy provider, supplied by new Exynos-usb2phy using
> Generic phy framework.
> Keeping the support for older USB phy intact right now, in order
> to prevent any functionality break in absence of relevant
> device tree side change for ehci-exynos.
> Once we move to new phy in the device nodes for ehci, we can
> remove the support for older phys.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kamil Debski <k.debski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> [gautam.vivek@xxxxxxxxxxx: Addressed review comments from mailing list]
> [gautam.vivek@xxxxxxxxxxx: Kept the code for old usb-phy, and just
> added support for new exynos5-usb2phy in generic phy framework]
> [gautam.vivek@xxxxxxxxxxx: Edited the commit message]
> Signed-off-by: Vivek Gautam <gautam.vivek@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> +static int exynos_ehci_phyg_off(struct phy *phy[])
> +{
> + int i;
> + int ret = 0;
> +
> + for (i = 0; ret == 0 && i < PHY_NUMBER; i++)
> + if (phy[i])
> + ret = phy_power_off(phy[i]);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
Same comment as in the OHCI driver about ret.
> @@ -175,6 +269,7 @@ skip_phy:
> fail_add_hcd:
> if (exynos_ehci->phy)
> usb_phy_shutdown(exynos_ehci->phy);
> + exynos_ehci_phyg_off(exynos_ehci->phy_g);
> fail_io:
> clk_disable_unprepare(exynos_ehci->clk);
> fail_clk:
> @@ -195,6 +290,8 @@ static int exynos_ehci_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> if (exynos_ehci->phy)
> usb_phy_shutdown(exynos_ehci->phy);
>
> + exynos_ehci_phyg_off(exynos_ehci->phy_g);
> +
In both these places, you need to test exynos_ehci->phyg before calling
exynos_ehci_phyg_off().
Maybe it would help to add exynos_ehci_phy_enable/disable routines,
like in the OHCI driver.
Alan Stern
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
