On pią, 2014-05-30 at 14:56 +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> On 30.05.2014 14:46, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > On pią, 2014-05-30 at 13:50 +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> >> Hi Krzysztof,
> >>
> >> On 13.05.2014 16:12, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >>> On Exynos4212 USE_DELAYED_RESET_ASSERTION must be set in
> >>> ARM_CORE1_OPTION register during CPU power down. This is the proper way
> >>> of powering down CPU. Additionally without this the CPU clock down won't
> >>> work after powering down CPU1 and CPU will work at full frequency chosen
> >>> by CPUfreq governor.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>> ---
> >>> arch/arm/mach-exynos/hotplug.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> >>> arch/arm/mach-exynos/regs-pmu.h | 2 ++
> >>> 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/hotplug.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/hotplug.c
> >>> index 5eead530c6f8..59b813e74558 100644
> >>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/hotplug.c
> >>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/hotplug.c
> >>> @@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ static inline void cpu_enter_lowpower_a15(void)
> >>> dsb();
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> -static inline void cpu_leave_lowpower(void)
> >>> +static inline void cpu_leave_lowpower(unsigned int cpu)
> >>> {
> >>> unsigned int v;
> >>>
> >>> @@ -88,6 +88,14 @@ static inline void cpu_leave_lowpower(void)
> >>> : "=&r" (v)
> >>> : "Ir" (CR_C), "Ir" (0x40)
> >>> : "cc");
> >>> +
> >>> + if (cpu == 1 && soc_is_exynos4212()) {
> >>
> >> AFAIK this is needed not only on Exynos4x12, but at least also on 4412.
> >> Also I don't think the (cpu == 1) condition is necessary. See below.
> >
> > I'll test it on Exynos4412.
> >
> >>
> >>> + unsigned int tmp;
> >>> +
> >>> + tmp = __raw_readl(S5P_ARM_CORE1_OPTION);
> >>> + tmp &= ~(S5P_USE_DELAYED_RESET_ASSERTION);
> >>> + __raw_writel(tmp, S5P_ARM_CORE1_OPTION);
> >>> + }
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> static inline void platform_do_lowpower(unsigned int cpu, int *spurious)
> >>> @@ -95,8 +103,22 @@ static inline void platform_do_lowpower(unsigned int cpu, int *spurious)
> >>> for (;;) {
> >>>
> >>> /* make cpu1 to be turned off at next WFI command */
> >>> - if (cpu == 1)
> >>> + if (cpu == 1) {
> >>
> >> I think this patch should be rebased on top of my "[PATCH] ARM: EXYNOS:
> >> Fix core ID used by platsmp and hotplug code". Then instead of if (cpu
> >> == 1) you would just use EXYNOS_ARM_CORE_OPTION(core_id).
> >>
> >> Also same comment as above, I believe this is also needed on Exynos4412.
> >
> > Probably your patch needs rebasing too. I couldn't apply (cleanly) on
> > current Linus' tree and on Kukjin's for-next. What are the requirements
> > for it?
>
> Hmm, I based it on Kukjin's for-next from the day I sent the patch,
> 23.05 if I remember correctly. AFAICT everything needed by this patch is
> already merged in Kukjin's tree (and I believe already was when I sent
> that patch).
>
> To make sure, I'm talking about this patch:
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-samsung-soc/msg31604.html
Yep, that's the patch but still it does not apply cleanly :). Anyway
I'll send next version of my patch reflecting your comments:
1. Limit to all Exynos4 SoCs.
2. Rebase on your patch to utilize EXYNOS_ARM_CORE_OPTION(core_id).
Best regards,
Krzysztof
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
