On 30.05.2014 14:46, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On pią, 2014-05-30 at 13:50 +0200, Tomasz Figa wrote:
>> Hi Krzysztof,
>>
>> On 13.05.2014 16:12, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On Exynos4212 USE_DELAYED_RESET_ASSERTION must be set in
>>> ARM_CORE1_OPTION register during CPU power down. This is the proper way
>>> of powering down CPU. Additionally without this the CPU clock down won't
>>> work after powering down CPU1 and CPU will work at full frequency chosen
>>> by CPUfreq governor.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> arch/arm/mach-exynos/hotplug.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>>> arch/arm/mach-exynos/regs-pmu.h | 2 ++
>>> 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/hotplug.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/hotplug.c
>>> index 5eead530c6f8..59b813e74558 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/hotplug.c
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/hotplug.c
>>> @@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ static inline void cpu_enter_lowpower_a15(void)
>>> dsb();
>>> }
>>>
>>> -static inline void cpu_leave_lowpower(void)
>>> +static inline void cpu_leave_lowpower(unsigned int cpu)
>>> {
>>> unsigned int v;
>>>
>>> @@ -88,6 +88,14 @@ static inline void cpu_leave_lowpower(void)
>>> : "=&r" (v)
>>> : "Ir" (CR_C), "Ir" (0x40)
>>> : "cc");
>>> +
>>> + if (cpu == 1 && soc_is_exynos4212()) {
>>
>> AFAIK this is needed not only on Exynos4x12, but at least also on 4412.
>> Also I don't think the (cpu == 1) condition is necessary. See below.
>
> I'll test it on Exynos4412.
>
>>
>>> + unsigned int tmp;
>>> +
>>> + tmp = __raw_readl(S5P_ARM_CORE1_OPTION);
>>> + tmp &= ~(S5P_USE_DELAYED_RESET_ASSERTION);
>>> + __raw_writel(tmp, S5P_ARM_CORE1_OPTION);
>>> + }
>>> }
>>>
>>> static inline void platform_do_lowpower(unsigned int cpu, int *spurious)
>>> @@ -95,8 +103,22 @@ static inline void platform_do_lowpower(unsigned int cpu, int *spurious)
>>> for (;;) {
>>>
>>> /* make cpu1 to be turned off at next WFI command */
>>> - if (cpu == 1)
>>> + if (cpu == 1) {
>>
>> I think this patch should be rebased on top of my "[PATCH] ARM: EXYNOS:
>> Fix core ID used by platsmp and hotplug code". Then instead of if (cpu
>> == 1) you would just use EXYNOS_ARM_CORE_OPTION(core_id).
>>
>> Also same comment as above, I believe this is also needed on Exynos4412.
>
> Probably your patch needs rebasing too. I couldn't apply (cleanly) on
> current Linus' tree and on Kukjin's for-next. What are the requirements
> for it?
Hmm, I based it on Kukjin's for-next from the day I sent the patch,
23.05 if I remember correctly. AFAICT everything needed by this patch is
already merged in Kukjin's tree (and I believe already was when I sent
that patch).
To make sure, I'm talking about this patch:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-samsung-soc/msg31604.html
Best regards,
Tomasz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
