Hi, On Wednesday, May 21, 2014 10:40:07 PM Kukjin Kim wrote: > Sachin Kamat wrote: > > > > Hi Bartlomiej, > > > > On 21 May 2014 16:06, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz > > <b.zolnierkie@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > On Wednesday, May 21, 2014 12:22:48 PM Sachin Kamat wrote: > > >> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> > > >> > > >> This makes it possible to enable the exynos platform as part of a > > >> multiplatform kernel, in addition to keeping the single-platform > > >> Exynos support. > > > > > > The patch description is wrong. After this patch single-platform Exynos > > > support is no longer available > > > > Forgot to update the message while rebasing. Thanks for noticing. > > > > > and it adds at least one serious regression > > > > I have mentioned about this in the cover letter. > > > > > (cpufreq) which should be fixed before merging this patch. Moreover it > > > seems that this patch (#2) should be merged with patch #3 to preserve > > > bisectability. > > > > At this point exynos_defconfig works. > > > > >Please also note that exynos_defconfig is no longer useful > > > after these changes and can be be removed. > > > > Yes. > > > Well, I think keeping the exynos_defconfig would be nice like other platform in multiplatforms...and I'm going to enable possible configs in exynos_defconfig for exynso SoCs then it can cover more for exynos... I know that many other platforms still have their own configs [*] but I would strongly prefer to have a single config supporting Exynos SoCs (that would be a multiplatform one) to simplify testing and prevent situations when something works with one config but not the other. [*] I also hope that they get removed in the longer-term.. Best regards, -- Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Samsung R&D Institute Poland Samsung Electronics -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |