Sachin Kamat wrote: > > Hi Bartlomiej, > > On 21 May 2014 16:06, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz > <b.zolnierkie@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > On Wednesday, May 21, 2014 12:22:48 PM Sachin Kamat wrote: > >> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> > >> > >> This makes it possible to enable the exynos platform as part of a > >> multiplatform kernel, in addition to keeping the single-platform > >> Exynos support. > > > > The patch description is wrong. After this patch single-platform Exynos > > support is no longer available > > Forgot to update the message while rebasing. Thanks for noticing. > > > and it adds at least one serious regression > > I have mentioned about this in the cover letter. > > > (cpufreq) which should be fixed before merging this patch. Moreover it > > seems that this patch (#2) should be merged with patch #3 to preserve > > bisectability. > > At this point exynos_defconfig works. > > >Please also note that exynos_defconfig is no longer useful > > after these changes and can be be removed. > > Yes. > Well, I think keeping the exynos_defconfig would be nice like other platform in multiplatforms...and I'm going to enable possible configs in exynos_defconfig for exynso SoCs then it can cover more for exynos... Thanks, Kukjin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |