Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> On Saturday, May 17, 2014 01:04:29 AM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Friday, May 16, 2014 07:54:01 PM Kukjin Kim wrote:
> > > Jonghwan Choi wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Commit 7da83a80 ("ARM: EXYNOS: Migrate Exynos specific macros from
> plat to
> > > > mach") which lands in samsung tree causes build breakage
> > > > for cpufreq-exynos like following:
> > > >
> > > > drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c: In function 'exynos_cpufreq_probe':
> > > > drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c:166:2: error: implicit declaration
> of
> > > > function 'soc_is_exynos4210'
> > > > [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> > > > drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c:168:2: error: implicit declaration
> of
> > > > function 'soc_is_exynos4212'
> > > > [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> > > > drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c:168:2: error: implicit declaration
> of
> > > > function 'soc_is_exynos4412'
> > > > [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> > > > drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c:170:2: error: implicit declaration
> of
> > > > function 'soc_is_exynos5250'
> > > > [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> > > > cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
> > > > make[2]: *** [drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.o] Error 1
> > > > make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
> > > > drivers/cpufreq/exynos4x12-cpufreq.c: In function
> 'exynos4x12_set_clkdiv':
> > > > drivers/cpufreq/exynos4x12-cpufreq.c:118:2: error: implicit
> declaration of
> > > > function 'soc_is_exynos4212'
> > > > [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> > > > cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
> > > > make[2]: *** [drivers/cpufreq/exynos4x12-cpufreq.o] Error 1
> > > > make[1]: *** [drivers/cpufreq] Error 2
> > > > This fixes above error with getting SoC information via
> > > > of_machine_is_compatible() instead of soc_is_exynosXXXX().
> > > >
> > >
> > > Probably,
> > > Suggested-by: Tomasz Figa ?
> > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Jonghwan Choi <jhbird.choi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > Looks better.
> > >
> > > Rafael, if you have no objection on this, shall I pick this into
> samsung
> > > tree for 3.16 because of the current build breakage with enabling
> exynos
> > > cpufreq?
> >
> > Please go ahead.
>
> Actually, this conflicts with one patch already in my tree. The
> resoultion
> is quite obvious, but it would be better to avoid this conflict altogether.
>
Yeah. If you don't mind, shall I pick the patch (commit e5eaa445b0dc)into samsung tree with your ack?
Thanks,
Kukjin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
