On Saturday, May 17, 2014 01:04:29 AM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Friday, May 16, 2014 07:54:01 PM Kukjin Kim wrote: > > Jonghwan Choi wrote: > > > > > > Commit 7da83a80 ("ARM: EXYNOS: Migrate Exynos specific macros from plat to > > > mach") which lands in samsung tree causes build breakage > > > for cpufreq-exynos like following: > > > > > > drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c: In function 'exynos_cpufreq_probe': > > > drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c:166:2: error: implicit declaration of > > > function 'soc_is_exynos4210' > > > [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > > > drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c:168:2: error: implicit declaration of > > > function 'soc_is_exynos4212' > > > [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > > > drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c:168:2: error: implicit declaration of > > > function 'soc_is_exynos4412' > > > [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > > > drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c:170:2: error: implicit declaration of > > > function 'soc_is_exynos5250' > > > [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > > > cc1: some warnings being treated as errors > > > make[2]: *** [drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.o] Error 1 > > > make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... > > > drivers/cpufreq/exynos4x12-cpufreq.c: In function 'exynos4x12_set_clkdiv': > > > drivers/cpufreq/exynos4x12-cpufreq.c:118:2: error: implicit declaration of > > > function 'soc_is_exynos4212' > > > [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > > > cc1: some warnings being treated as errors > > > make[2]: *** [drivers/cpufreq/exynos4x12-cpufreq.o] Error 1 > > > make[1]: *** [drivers/cpufreq] Error 2 > > > This fixes above error with getting SoC information via > > > of_machine_is_compatible() instead of soc_is_exynosXXXX(). > > > > > > > Probably, > > Suggested-by: Tomasz Figa ? > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jonghwan Choi <jhbird.choi@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Looks better. > > > > Rafael, if you have no objection on this, shall I pick this into samsung > > tree for 3.16 because of the current build breakage with enabling exynos > > cpufreq? > > Please go ahead. Actually, this conflicts with one patch already in my tree. The resoultion is quite obvious, but it would be better to avoid this conflict altogether. Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html