Hi Tomasz, On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 6:02 AM, Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On 16.05.2014 07:07, Abhilash Kesavan wrote: >> Hi Tomasz, >> >> On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 2:41 AM, Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> Hi Abhilash, >>> >>> On 13.05.2014 12:12, Abhilash Kesavan wrote: >>>> On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 7:54 AM, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> [snip] >>> >>>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/regs-pmu.h b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/regs- >>>>>> pmu.h >>>>>> index 4f6a256..0bdfcbc 100644 >>>>>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/regs-pmu.h >>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/regs-pmu.h >>>>>> @@ -121,6 +121,12 @@ >>>>>> >>>>>> #define S5P_CHECK_SLEEP 0x00000BAD >>>>>> >>>>>> +#define EXYNOS_ARM_CORE0_CONFIGURATION S5P_PMUREG(0x2000) >>>>> >>>>> This can be put in order of address. >>>> OK, will fix. >>>>> >>>>>> +#define EXYNOS_ARM_CORE_CONFIGURATION(_nr) \ >>>>>> + (EXYNOS_ARM_CORE0_CONFIGURATION + (0x80 * (_nr))) >>>>>> +#define EXYNOS_ARM_CORE_STATUS(_nr) \ >>>>>> + (EXYNOS_ARM_CORE_CONFIGURATION(_nr) + 0x4) >>> >>> My patches posted quite a while ago [1] to fix DT CPU topology already >>> add these, remove S5P_ARM_CORE1* and fix corresponding usage in >>> hotplug.c and platsmp.c. >>> >>> [1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.samsung-soc/29573 >>> >>> So I think you should rebase on top of them or at least on top of >>> patches 1 and 2 from that series, as 3 and 4 should be dropped. >> >> Patch 2 of your series does not apply on kgene's for-next or >> linux-next. Are you planning on re-sending this ? > > OK, it seems like Kukjin has already applied your v6 series, so let's > drop my series for now. I'll remove patch 1 from my series and rebase it > on top of your v6. Ok, thanks. Regards, Abhilash > > Best regards, > Tomasz -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |