Hi Abhilash, On 13.05.2014 12:12, Abhilash Kesavan wrote: > On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 7:54 AM, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: [snip] >>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/regs-pmu.h b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/regs- >>> pmu.h >>> index 4f6a256..0bdfcbc 100644 >>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/regs-pmu.h >>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/regs-pmu.h >>> @@ -121,6 +121,12 @@ >>> >>> #define S5P_CHECK_SLEEP 0x00000BAD >>> >>> +#define EXYNOS_ARM_CORE0_CONFIGURATION S5P_PMUREG(0x2000) >> >> This can be put in order of address. > OK, will fix. >> >>> +#define EXYNOS_ARM_CORE_CONFIGURATION(_nr) \ >>> + (EXYNOS_ARM_CORE0_CONFIGURATION + (0x80 * (_nr))) >>> +#define EXYNOS_ARM_CORE_STATUS(_nr) \ >>> + (EXYNOS_ARM_CORE_CONFIGURATION(_nr) + 0x4) My patches posted quite a while ago [1] to fix DT CPU topology already add these, remove S5P_ARM_CORE1* and fix corresponding usage in hotplug.c and platsmp.c. [1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.samsung-soc/29573 So I think you should rebase on top of them or at least on top of patches 1 and 2 from that series, as 3 and 4 should be dropped. Best regards, Tomasz -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |