Hi Tomasz, Am Samstag, 10. Mai 2014, 01:11:45 schrieb Tomasz Figa: > On 10.05.2014 01:07, Heiko Stübner wrote: > > Am Freitag, 9. Mai 2014, 19:53:21 schrieb Tomasz Figa: > >> On 09.05.2014 18:49, Paul Bolle wrote: > >>> On Wed, 2014-04-23 at 22:09 +0200, Heiko Stübner wrote: > >>>> Add platform device and select the correct implementation automatically > >>>> depending on wether the old samsung_clock or the common clock framework > >>>> is enabled. > >>>> > >>>> This is only done for machines already using the old dclk > >>>> implementation, > >>>> as everybody else should move to use dt anyway. > >>>> > >>>> The machine-specific settings for the external clocks will have to be > >>>> set > >>>> by somebody with knowledge about the specific hardware. > >>>> > >>>> Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@xxxxxxxxx> > >>>> Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@xxxxxxxxxxx> > >>> > >>> It seems this one just hit linux-next (in next-20140509). > >> > >> Which is bad, because: > >> a) it conflicts with patches already applied in samsung-clk tree, > > > > I remember seeing patches regarding more than one clk-samsung clock > > providers. Do you need any additional changes for s3c24xx from me for > > this? > > Yes, that's the problem here. If you could do it, I would appreciate it, > but if you don't have time then I can handle this. The changes needed > are mostly trivial - basically every common samsung_clk function gets > new argument to a context structure. The branch to base on would be > for_3.16/exynos5260 in samsung-clk tree. > > >> b) the DT binding added by patch 4/9 has not been acked . > > > > I'm not 100% sure if this is necessary, as the binding is similar to most > > other Samsung bindings and looking through recent clock binding changes I > > didn't find any that seemed to have a special dt-maintainer ack - > > including > > Exynos ones. Also if I remember correctly there was this "if we don't > > respond, carry on" policy around :-) . > > Well, for me this could go as is, but rules should be followed and the > rules are ACK or 3 weeks and a ping without response. So we need to wait > at least to next Wednesday to bypass DT review. so I only remembered the abbreviated version of this :-) [without the 3 weeks requirement]. My guess is I should be able to adapt it to this change and also fix the typo Paul found until then. Heiko -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |