Am Freitag, 9. Mai 2014, 19:53:21 schrieb Tomasz Figa: > On 09.05.2014 18:49, Paul Bolle wrote: > > On Wed, 2014-04-23 at 22:09 +0200, Heiko Stübner wrote: > >> Add platform device and select the correct implementation automatically > >> depending on wether the old samsung_clock or the common clock framework > >> is enabled. > >> > >> This is only done for machines already using the old dclk implementation, > >> as everybody else should move to use dt anyway. > >> > >> The machine-specific settings for the external clocks will have to be set > >> by somebody with knowledge about the specific hardware. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@xxxxxxxxx> > >> Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > It seems this one just hit linux-next (in next-20140509). > > Which is bad, because: > a) it conflicts with patches already applied in samsung-clk tree, I remember seeing patches regarding more than one clk-samsung clock providers. Do you need any additional changes for s3c24xx from me for this? > b) the DT binding added by patch 4/9 has not been acked . I'm not 100% sure if this is necessary, as the binding is similar to most other Samsung bindings and looking through recent clock binding changes I didn't find any that seemed to have a special dt-maintainer ack - including Exynos ones. Also if I remember correctly there was this "if we don't respond, carry on" policy around :-) . Heiko > Kukjin, might I ask you to drop this series from your tree and let me > send you a pull request with necessary dependencies and this series > applied properly to resolve merge conflicts, as I suggested before in > one of my replies to this thread? > > Best regards, > Tomasz -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |