Francois Romieu wrote : > Byungho An <bh74.an@xxxxxxxxxxx> : > > Florian Fainelli wrote: > [...] > > > I think that at some point you should revisit your abstraction, all > > > the patches that I see do take a void __iomem * argument as the first > > > function argument, you should probably use your driver private context > > > here. The day you support a different version of the hardware, there > > > might be other differences that need to be taken care of. > > > > > I agree with you, it would be more robust for different version of the > hardware and make simple function argument. > > But most functions of this driver deal with read/write register using > ioaddr. > > It does not imply that they should urge on ioaddr. > > drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/tg3.c gets it right and there is no reason > why sxgbe should be different. > I fully understood. > > As of now I think it is enough but I'll consider it later. > > In the meantime: > 1) more use-once function pointers are added > 2) their parameter list keeps growing > > Please reconsider sooner than later. I'll revisit above things sooner (after this patch set). Thanks. > > -- > Ueimor -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html