Hi Heiko, On 1 May 2014 18:57, Heiko Stübner <heiko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Sachin, > > Am Donnerstag, 1. Mai 2014, 16:14:44 schrieb Sachin Kamat: >> Instead of hardcoding the SYSRAM details for each SoC, >> pass this information through device tree (DT) and make >> the code SoC agnostic. Generic SRAM bindings are used >> for achieving this. >> >> Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@xxxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@xxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> > > very cool :-). Thanks :) > > I've found one little thing I do not understand, which I describe below. > Otherwise > Acked-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@xxxxxxxxx> > >> --- >> This patch is based on linux next (next-20140501) on top of >> my Kconfig consolidation patch >> http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.samsung-soc/28642 >> >> Tested on 4210/4412 Origen, 5250/5420 Arndale and SMDK5420 boards. >> --- >> arch/arm/Kconfig | 1 + >> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210-universal_c210.dts | 17 ++++++ >> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210.dtsi | 18 +++++++ >> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4x12.dtsi | 18 +++++++ >> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi | 18 +++++++ >> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi | 18 +++++++ >> arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.h | 1 + >> arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c | 64 >> ----------------------- arch/arm/mach-exynos/firmware.c | >> 5 +- >> arch/arm/mach-exynos/include/mach/map.h | 7 --- >> arch/arm/mach-exynos/platsmp.c | 39 +++++++++++++- >> 11 files changed, 133 insertions(+), 73 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig >> index a6aaaad19b1a..f66ea9453df9 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm/Kconfig >> +++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig >> @@ -855,6 +855,7 @@ config ARCH_EXYNOS >> select S5P_DEV_MFC >> select SAMSUNG_DMADEV >> select SPARSE_IRQ >> + select SRAM >> select USE_OF >> help >> Support for SAMSUNG's EXYNOS SoCs (EXYNOS4/5) >> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210-universal_c210.dts >> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210-universal_c210.dts index >> 63e34b24b04f..8d4de5c0d0c7 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210-universal_c210.dts >> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210-universal_c210.dts >> @@ -28,6 +28,23 @@ >> bootargs = "console=ttySAC2,115200N8 root=/dev/mmcblk0p5 rw rootwait >> earlyprintk panic=5 maxcpus=1"; }; >> >> + sram@02020000 { >> + status = "disabled"; >> + }; >> + >> + sram@02025000 { >> + compatible = "mmio-sram"; >> + reg = <0x02025000 0x1000>; >> + #address-cells = <1>; >> + #size-cells = <1>; >> + ranges = <0 0x02025000 0x1000>; >> + >> + smp-sram@0 { >> + compatible = "samsung,exynos4210-sram"; >> + reg = <0x0 0x1000>; >> + }; >> + }; > > exynos_smp_prepare_sram returns -ENODEV if it can't find > samsung,exynos4210-sram-ns, so are you sure your universal_c210 will run > without it? I didn't dig to deep into this, so it can also simply be something > I overlooked :-) Actually I do not have a universal_c210 board and hence could not check on it and thus this point got overlooked. Thanks for spotting it and you are right. There shouldn't be a error return if second node is not present as it is optional. I will modify accordingly and send this patch again. Thanks for your review and Ack :) -- With warm regards, Sachin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |