Rahul Sharma wrote: > > Hi Kukjin, > Hi, > Need this macro to enable build for clock driver. > I found it in your patch, "clk/exynos5260: add clock file for exynos5260". For consistency, I'm fine on this, if Tomasz has no objection me to pick this into samsung tree for the 5260 clock stuff "drivers/clk/samsung/Makefile". Thanks, Kukjin > Regards, > Rahul Sharma. > > > On 22 April 2014 15:36, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Tomasz Figa wrote: > >> > >> On 16.04.2014 10:08, Sachin Kamat wrote: > >> > Hi Tomasz, > >> > > >> > On 16 April 2014 13:27, Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> >> Hi Rahul, > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> On 16.04.2014 05:58, Rahul Sharma wrote: > >> >>> > >> >>> From: Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@xxxxxxxxxxx> > >> >>> > >> >>> This patch add basic arch side support for exynos5260 SoC. > >> >>> > >> >>> Signed-off-by: Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@xxxxxxxxxxx> > >> >>> Signed-off-by: Rahul Sharma <rahul.sharma@xxxxxxxxxxx> > >> >>> Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@xxxxxxxxxxx> > >> >>> --- > >> >>> arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig | 5 +++++ > >> >>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) > >> >>> > >> >>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach- > >> exynos/Kconfig > >> >>> index fc8bf18..bf4ed87 100644 > >> >>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig > >> >>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig > >> >>> @@ -84,6 +84,11 @@ config SOC_EXYNOS5250 > >> >>> help > >> >>> Enable EXYNOS5250 SoC support > >> >>> > >> >>> +config SOC_EXYNOS5260 > >> >>> + bool "SAMSUNG EXYNOS5260" > >> >>> + default y > >> >>> + depends on ARCH_EXYNOS5 > >> >>> + > >> >>> config SOC_EXYNOS5420 > >> >>> bool "SAMSUNG EXYNOS5420" > >> >>> default y > >> >>> > >> >> > >> >> Is this patch necessary now? After Sachin's consolidation series > there > >> are > >> >> no per SoC entries anymore. > >> > > >> > Kukjin still wanted individual SoCs to be selectable. Please refer > [1]. > >> > > >> > [1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/devicetree/msg27040.html > >> > >> I don't think any valid reason was presented there. Features in code > >> should not be selected using #ifdef CONFIG_ anymore, so I don't really > >> see any reason to not proceed with this consolidation. Olof, Arnd? > >> > > Hi, > > > > Yeah, in this case, nothing happened with adding SOC_EXYNOS5260. So I > don't have any idea why this is required. > > > > - Kukjin > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |