On 16.04.2014 10:08, Sachin Kamat wrote:
Hi Tomasz,
On 16 April 2014 13:27, Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Rahul,
On 16.04.2014 05:58, Rahul Sharma wrote:
From: Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@xxxxxxxxxxx>
This patch add basic arch side support for exynos5260 SoC.
Signed-off-by: Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Rahul Sharma <rahul.sharma@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig
index fc8bf18..bf4ed87 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig
@@ -84,6 +84,11 @@ config SOC_EXYNOS5250
help
Enable EXYNOS5250 SoC support
+config SOC_EXYNOS5260
+ bool "SAMSUNG EXYNOS5260"
+ default y
+ depends on ARCH_EXYNOS5
+
config SOC_EXYNOS5420
bool "SAMSUNG EXYNOS5420"
default y
Is this patch necessary now? After Sachin's consolidation series there are
no per SoC entries anymore.
Kukjin still wanted individual SoCs to be selectable. Please refer [1].
[1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/devicetree/msg27040.html
I don't think any valid reason was presented there. Features in code
should not be selected using #ifdef CONFIG_ anymore, so I don't really
see any reason to not proceed with this consolidation. Olof, Arnd?
Best regards,
Tomasz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
