Hi, On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 8:07 AM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > If there are cross-subsystem dependencies I prefer to use immutable >> > branches to eliminate any change of merge conflicts in -next or the >> > next merge window. I'm happy to either create on with Mark's Acks, or >> > receive a pull-request from Mark with mine applied. >> >> > Up to Mark. >> >> Well, Doug didn't send me the MFD patch so I can't do anything with it >> anyway. > > Ah! > > Doug, > what exactly are the dependencies within the set? I will repost the patch shortly with Mark on the CC list. Status of the patches in this series: - Patch #1 (mfd no irq) has no dependencies, though patch #2 won't work without it. https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/4004441/ Acked by you. Not landed anywhere that I'm aware of. -- - Patch #2 (charger polling) can be applied without patch #1 but won't actually make charger polling work without it. https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/4004461/ Not acked or applied anywhere. --- - Patch #3 (caching) can be applied before retries patch but not after. https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/4033361/ This is the patch we need. I just resent with Mark on the CC list (including your ack). --- - Patch #4 (overcurrent wait time) can be applied before retries patch but not after (just due to merge conflicts, no other reason). https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/4004471/ I believe Mark has already applied. --- - Patch #5 (retries) absolutely requires patch #3 (caching). https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/4004521/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |