> Mark, > > On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 10:43 AM, Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 04:12:29PM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote: > >> An issue was discovered with tps65090 where sometimes the FETs > >> wouldn't actually turn on when requested (they would report > >> overcurrent). The most problematic FET was the one used for the LCD > > > > This is basically fine but you said it depends on one of the previous > > patches which you didn't CC me on so I've no idea what's going on > > there? > > Sorry about that. :( > > Lee has Acked the caching patch. Lee: what's the best way for you and > Mark to coordinate there? Should he apply the caching patch with your > Ack? If there are cross-subsystem dependencies I prefer to use immutable branches to eliminate any change of merge conflicts in -next or the next merge window. I'm happy to either create on with Mark's Acks, or receive a pull-request from Mark with mine applied. Up to Mark. -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |