Dear Kukjin and Tomasz, On 04/11/2014 10:31 AM, Chanwoo Choi wrote: > Hi, > > On 04/10/2014 06:43 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >> On Thursday 10 April 2014 18:28:18 Chanwoo Choi wrote: >>> This patch add Exynos3250's SoC ID. Exynos 3250 is System-On-Chip(SoC) that >>> is based on the 32-bit RISC processor for Smartphone. Exynos3250 uses Cortex-A7 >>> dual cores and has a target speed of 1.0GHz. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>> Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>> --- >>> arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++ >>> arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c | 1 + >>> arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/cpu.h | 10 ++++++++++ >>> 3 files changed, 33 insertions(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig >>> index fc8bf18..6da8a68 100644 >>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig >>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig >>> @@ -11,6 +11,17 @@ if ARCH_EXYNOS >>> >>> menu "SAMSUNG EXYNOS SoCs Support" >>> >>> +config ARCH_EXYNOS3 >>> + bool "SAMSUNG EXYNOS3" >>> + select ARM_AMBA >>> + select CLKSRC_OF >>> + select HAVE_ARM_SCU if SMP >>> + select HAVE_SMP >>> + select PINCTRL >>> + select PM_GENERIC_DOMAINS if PM_RUNTIME >>> + help >>> + Samsung EXYNOS3 SoCs based systems >>> + >> >> Isn't S5PV210 also called an Exynos3 these days? Are we going to get >> any conflicts here when merging that code into Exynos as Tomasz has >> suggested in the past? > > I knew. But, S5PV210/S5PC110 has not yet included in Exynos3 category on mainline. > Need opinion of Exynos SoC Maintainer to clear this ambiguous stuff. > > Dear Kukjin and Tomasz, > I need your opinion about this patch. > Please review this patch and reply about Arnd's comment. Best Regards, Chanwoo Choi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |