Hi, On 04/10/2014 06:43 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Thursday 10 April 2014 18:28:18 Chanwoo Choi wrote: >> This patch add Exynos3250's SoC ID. Exynos 3250 is System-On-Chip(SoC) that >> is based on the 32-bit RISC processor for Smartphone. Exynos3250 uses Cortex-A7 >> dual cores and has a target speed of 1.0GHz. >> >> Signed-off-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++ >> arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c | 1 + >> arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/cpu.h | 10 ++++++++++ >> 3 files changed, 33 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig >> index fc8bf18..6da8a68 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig >> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig >> @@ -11,6 +11,17 @@ if ARCH_EXYNOS >> >> menu "SAMSUNG EXYNOS SoCs Support" >> >> +config ARCH_EXYNOS3 >> + bool "SAMSUNG EXYNOS3" >> + select ARM_AMBA >> + select CLKSRC_OF >> + select HAVE_ARM_SCU if SMP >> + select HAVE_SMP >> + select PINCTRL >> + select PM_GENERIC_DOMAINS if PM_RUNTIME >> + help >> + Samsung EXYNOS3 SoCs based systems >> + > > Isn't S5PV210 also called an Exynos3 these days? Are we going to get > any conflicts here when merging that code into Exynos as Tomasz has > suggested in the past? I knew. But, S5PV210/S5PC110 has not yet included in Exynos3 category on mainline. Need opinion of Exynos SoC Maintainer to clear this ambiguous stuff. Dear Kukjin and Tomasz, I need your opinion about this patch. Best Regards, Chanwoo Choi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |