On Thu, 2014-03-13 at 05:53 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> Maybe this was supposed to be something like
>
> ns = p->tstamp_lo
> ns |= ((u64)tstamp_hi) << 32;
>
> If not, maybe it warrants a comment around
> here or on the descriptor definition
[]
> > +struct sxgbe_rx_ctxt_desc {
> > + u32 tstamp_lo:32;
> > + u32 tstamp_hi:32;
or maybe these would be better renamed like:
u32 tstamp_nsecs;
u32 tstamp_secs;
btw2: I still think using
u32 foo:32;
is asking for gcc to generate bad code.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
