Hi Inki,
Thanks for the review.
On 03/05/2014 07:46 AM, Inki Dae wrote:
> 2014-02-12 20:31 GMT+09:00 Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
>> The patch adds driver for Toshiba DSI/LVDS TC358764 bridge.
>> Driver registers itself as mipi_dsi_driver. It is exposed to the
>> system via drm_panel interface, it uses also drm_panel framework
>> to interact with LVDS panel connected to it.
>> Driver supports only DT bindings.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/panel/Kconfig | 7 +
>> drivers/gpu/drm/panel/Makefile | 1 +
>> drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-tc358764.c | 505 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 3 files changed, 513 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-tc358764.c
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/Kconfig b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/Kconfig
>> index 7527557..b98a485 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/Kconfig
>> @@ -23,4 +23,11 @@ config DRM_PANEL_S6E8AA0
>> select DRM_MIPI_DSI
>> select VIDEOMODE_HELPERS
>>
>> +config DRM_PANEL_TC358764
>> + tristate "TC358764 DSI/LVDS bridge"
>> + depends on DRM && DRM_PANEL
>> + depends on OF
>> + select DRM_MIPI_DSI
>> + select VIDEOMODE_HELPERS
>> +
>> endmenu
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/Makefile b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/Makefile
>> index 181265b..7cbb0cf 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/Makefile
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/Makefile
>> @@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
>> obj-$(CONFIG_DRM_PANEL_SIMPLE) += panel-simple.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_DRM_PANEL_S6E8AA0) += panel-s6e8aa0.o
>> +obj-$(CONFIG_DRM_PANEL_TC358764) += panel-tc358764.o
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-tc358764.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-tc358764.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..f9c1289
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-tc358764.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,505 @@
>> +/*
>> + * TC358764 MIPI-DSI to LVDS bridge panel driver.
>> + *
>> + * Copyright (c) 2013 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd
>> + *
>> + * Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> + *
>> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
>> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
>> + * published by the Free Software Foundation.
>> +*/
>> +
>> +#include <drm/drmP.h>
>> +#include <drm/drm_mipi_dsi.h>
>> +#include <drm/drm_panel.h>
> ...
>> +/* of_* functions will be removed after acceptance of of_graph patches */
>> +static struct device_node *
>> +of_get_child_by_name_reg(struct device_node *parent, const char *name, u32 reg)
>> +{
>> + struct device_node *np;
>> +
>> + for_each_child_of_node(parent, np) {
>> + u32 r;
>> +
>> + if (!np->name || of_node_cmp(np->name, name))
>> + continue;
>> +
>> + if (of_property_read_u32(np, "reg", &r) < 0)
>> + r = 0;
>> +
>> + if (reg == r)
>> + break;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return np;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static struct device_node *of_graph_get_port_by_reg(struct device_node *parent,
>> + u32 reg)
>> +{
>> + struct device_node *ports, *port;
>> +
>> + ports = of_get_child_by_name(parent, "ports");
>> + if (ports) {
>> + port = of_get_child_by_name_reg(ports, "port", reg);
>> + of_node_put(ports);
>> + } else {
>> + port = of_get_child_by_name_reg(parent, "port", reg);
>> + }
>> + return port;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static struct device_node *
>> +of_graph_get_endpoint_by_reg(struct device_node *port, u32 reg)
>> +{
>> + return of_get_child_by_name_reg(port, "endpoint", reg);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static struct device_node *
>> +of_graph_get_remote_port_parent(const struct device_node *node)
>> +{
>> + struct device_node *np;
>> + unsigned int depth;
>> +
>> + /* Get remote endpoint node. */
>> + np = of_parse_phandle(node, "remote-endpoint", 0);
>> +
>> + /* Walk 3 levels up only if there is 'ports' node. */
>> + for (depth = 3; depth && np; depth--) {
>> + np = of_get_next_parent(np);
>> + if (depth == 2 && of_node_cmp(np->name, "ports"))
>> + break;
>> + }
>> + return np;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static struct device_node *tc358764_of_find_panel_node(struct device *dev)
>> +{
>> + struct device_node *np, *ep;
>> +
>> + np = of_graph_get_port_by_reg(dev->of_node, 1);
>> + if (!np)
>> + return NULL;
>> +
>> + ep = of_graph_get_endpoint_by_reg(np, 0);
>> + of_node_put(np);
>> + if (!ep)
>> + return NULL;
>> +
>> + np = of_graph_get_remote_port_parent(ep);
>> + of_node_put(ep);
>> +
>> + return np;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int tc358764_parse_dt(struct tc358764 *ctx)
>> +{
>> + struct device *dev = ctx->dev;
>> + struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
>> + struct device_node *lvds;
>> +
>> + ctx->reset_gpio = of_get_named_gpio(np, "reset-gpio", 0);
>> + if (ctx->reset_gpio < 0) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "no reset GPIO pin provided\n");
>> + //return ctx->reset_gpio;
> Seem like your mistake.
Thanks, it should not be commented, it sneaked out somehow.
>
>> + }
>> +
>> + lvds = tc358764_of_find_panel_node(ctx->dev);
> Isn't lvds device_node object of real lcd panel device, hv070wsa-100?
> it seems like more meaningful to use panel instead of lvds.
Yes I will change it.
>
>> + if (!lvds) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "cannot find panel node\n");
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> + ctx->panel = of_drm_find_panel(lvds);
>> + if (!ctx->panel) {
>> + dev_info(dev, "panel not registered\n");
>> + return -EPROBE_DEFER;
> That is what I concerned. This driver uses deferred probe feature
> because real LCD panel driver couldn't be probed yet at this moment.
> That isn't reasonable to me. There would be a better way than this
> one.
I think it can be avoided using your super-node patches.
Anyway deferred probe is used anyway, the bridge and the panel
can use other resources like regulators, clocks which can be also not
yet present during probe.
>
>> + }
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int tc358764_configure_regulators(struct tc358764 *ctx)
>> +{
>> + int i, ret;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(ctx->supplies); ++i)
>> + ctx->supplies[i].supply = tc358764_supplies[i];
>> +
>> + ret = devm_regulator_bulk_get(ctx->dev, ARRAY_SIZE(ctx->supplies),
>> + ctx->supplies);
>> + if (ret < 0)
>> + dev_info(ctx->dev, "failed to get regulators: %d\n", ret);
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int tc358764_probe(struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi)
>> +{
>> + struct device *dev = &dsi->dev;
>> + struct tc358764 *ctx;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + ctx = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(struct tc358764), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!ctx) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "failed to allocate tc358764 structure.\n");
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> + }
>> +
>> + mipi_dsi_set_drvdata(dsi, ctx);
>> +
>> + ctx->dev = dev;
>> +
>> + dsi->lanes = 4;
>> + dsi->format = MIPI_DSI_FMT_RGB888;
>> + dsi->mode_flags = MIPI_DSI_MODE_VIDEO | MIPI_DSI_MODE_VIDEO_BURST
>> + | MIPI_DSI_MODE_VIDEO_AUTO_VERT;
> Is it right for the pixel format, mode type and lane count are fixed?
> I think these could be changed according to LCD type and its
> resolution.
I have no access to tc358764 datasheet so I can only guess
that some parameters are determined by LCD but the bridge
is also capable to perform some conversions.
I set parameters here as sane defaults. If there will be other use cases
than arndale it can be extended in the future.
Regards
Andrzej
>
>> +
>> + ret = tc358764_parse_dt(ctx);
>> + if (ret < 0)
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> + ret = tc358764_configure_regulators(ctx);
>> + if (ret < 0)
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> + ret = devm_gpio_request_one(dev, ctx->reset_gpio, GPIOF_DIR_OUT,
>> + "TC358764_RESET");
>> + if (ret < 0) {
>> + dev_info(dev, "failed to request reset gpio\n");
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> +
>> + drm_panel_init(&ctx->bridge);
>> + ctx->bridge.dev = dev;
>> + ctx->bridge.funcs = &tc358764_drm_funcs;
>> +
>> + ret = drm_panel_add(&ctx->bridge);
>> + if (ret < 0)
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> + ret = mipi_dsi_attach(dsi);
>> + if (ret < 0)
>> + drm_panel_remove(&ctx->bridge);
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int tc358764_remove(struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi)
>> +{
>> + struct tc358764 *ctx = mipi_dsi_get_drvdata(dsi);
>> +
>> + tc358764_poweroff(ctx);
>> +
>> + mipi_dsi_detach(dsi);
>> + drm_panel_remove(&ctx->bridge);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static struct of_device_id tc358764_of_match[] = {
>> + { .compatible = "toshiba,tc358764" },
>> + { }
>> +};
>> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, tc358764_of_match);
>> +
>> +static struct mipi_dsi_driver tc358764_driver = {
>> + .probe = tc358764_probe,
>> + .remove = tc358764_remove,
>> + .driver = {
>> + .name = "panel_tc358764",
>> + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
>> + .of_match_table = tc358764_of_match,
>> + },
>> +};
>> +module_mipi_dsi_driver(tc358764_driver);
>> +
>> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@xxxxxxxxxxx>");
>> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("MIPI-DSI based Driver for TC358764 DSI/LVDS Bridge");
>> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
>> --
>> 1.8.3.2
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> dri-devel mailing list
>> dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
