On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 11:32 PM, Sudeep Holla <Sudeep.Holla@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On 07/02/14 17:37, Nishanth Menon wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Sudeep Holla <Sudeep.Holla@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > [...] > >>> Yes I think its counter-intuitive as it's visible to the userspace(list of >>> frequencies and the boost parameters are exposed through sysfs) >> >> That will be a different problem -> as currently every single >> frequency in the cpufreq list has ability to be marked as boost >> frequency - if userspace does not maintain that, then, IMHO, fix the >> userspace :D >> > > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/cpufreq/scaling_available_frequencies gives > the list of frequencies based on the state of the boost feature at anytime. The list of frequencies in /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/cpufreq/scaling_available_frequencies does not change based in the state of the boost feature (enabled or disabled). But the scaling_max_frequency and scaling_min_frequency are updated based on the set of available + boost frequencies available. > > Intuitively the list without boost shouldn't have any frequency above the range > when it's enabled :), that's what I was referring to. So I am not talking about > any issue with user-space maintenance. > > Regards, > Sudeep > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |