On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Sudeep Holla <Sudeep.Holla@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > Yes I thought of exactly similar clock setup, but was not convinced that it > should be part of OPP. In that case it looks like we are trying to represent > clock internals through some OPP bindings. And this series (rightly) does not make it an OPP behavior. instead all it does is to list the boost-frequencies and mark those in cpufreq table. the description is left to the dts and implementation to the clock drivers involved. > Yes I think its counter-intuitive as it's visible to the userspace(list of > frequencies and the boost parameters are exposed through sysfs) That will be a different problem -> as currently every single frequency in the cpufreq list has ability to be marked as boost frequency - if userspace does not maintain that, then, IMHO, fix the userspace :D Regards, Nishanth Menon -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |