Hi Rahul,
Please see my comments inline.
On Friday 06 of December 2013 21:26:28 Rahul Sharma wrote:
> Samsung CCF helper functions do not provide support to
> register multiple Clock Providers for a given SoC. Due to
> this limitation SoC platforms are not able to use these
> helpers for registering mulitple clock providers and are
> forced to bypass this layer.
>
> This layer is modified acordingly to enable the support.
>
> Clockfile for exynos4, exynos5250, exynos5420, exynos5440
> and S3c64xx are also modified as per changed helper functions.
[snip]
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk.c b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk.c
> index 91bec3e..20de446 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk.c
> @@ -15,11 +15,6 @@
> #include "clk.h"
>
> static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(lock);
IMHO you can also move the spinlock into samsung_clk_provider struct, to
have more fine grained locking, as you shouldn't need to lock between
particular providers, just multiple requests for one.
> -static struct clk **clk_table;
> -static void __iomem *reg_base;
> -#ifdef CONFIG_OF
> -static struct clk_onecell_data clk_data;
> -#endif
>
> void samsung_clk_save(void __iomem *base,
> struct samsung_clk_reg_dump *rd,
> @@ -55,40 +50,53 @@ struct samsung_clk_reg_dump *samsung_clk_alloc_reg_dump(
> }
>
> /* setup the essentials required to support clock lookup using ccf */
> -void __init samsung_clk_init(struct device_node *np, void __iomem *base,
> - unsigned long nr_clks)
> +struct samsung_clk_provider *__init samsung_clk_init(struct device_node *np,
> + void __iomem *base, unsigned long nr_clks)
> {
> - reg_base = base;
> + struct samsung_clk_provider *ctx;
> + struct clk **clk_table;
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (!np)
> + return NULL;
This check is incorrect. It's completely correct to call this function
with NULL np, when booted without DT and this was handled correctly
before this patch. Please keep the same behavior.
> +
> + ctx = kzalloc(sizeof(struct samsung_clk_provider), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!ctx)
> + panic("could not allocate clock provider context.\n");
>
> clk_table = kzalloc(sizeof(struct clk *) * nr_clks, GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!clk_table)
> panic("could not allocate clock lookup table\n");
>
> - if (!np)
> - return;
> + ctx->reg_base = base;
> + ctx->clk_data.clks = clk_table;
> + ctx->clk_data.clk_num = nr_clks;
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_OF
> - clk_data.clks = clk_table;
> - clk_data.clk_num = nr_clks;
> - of_clk_add_provider(np, of_clk_src_onecell_get, &clk_data);
> -#endif
> + ret = of_clk_add_provider(np, of_clk_src_onecell_get,
> + &ctx->clk_data);
> + if (ret)
> + panic("could not register clock provide\n");
> +
> + return ctx;
> }
[snip]
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk.h b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk.h
> index c7141ba..433bab3 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk.h
> +++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk.h
> @@ -21,6 +21,17 @@
> #include <linux/of_address.h>
> #include "clk-pll.h"
>
> +/* Context node which holds information about the clock provider. */
> +/**
> + * struct samsung_clk_provider: information about clock plovider
typo: s/plovider/provider/
> + * @reg_base: virtual address for the register base.
> + * @clk_data: holds clock related data like clk* and number of clocks.
> + */
Why two comments? The kerneldoc one should be enough.
> +struct samsung_clk_provider {
> + void __iomem *reg_base;
> + struct clk_onecell_data clk_data;
> +};
> +
> /**
> * struct samsung_clock_alias: information about mux clock
> * @id: platform specific id of the clock.
> @@ -312,29 +323,40 @@ struct samsung_pll_clock {
> __PLL(_typ, _id, NULL, _name, _pname, CLK_GET_RATE_NOCACHE, \
> _lock, _con, _rtable, _alias)
>
> -extern void __init samsung_clk_init(struct device_node *np, void __iomem *base,
> - unsigned long nr_clks);
> +extern struct samsung_clk_provider *__init samsung_clk_init(
> + struct device_node *np, void __iomem *base,
> + unsigned long nr_clks);
> extern void __init samsung_clk_of_register_fixed_ext(
> + struct samsung_clk_provider *ctx,
> struct samsung_fixed_rate_clock *fixed_rate_clk,
> unsigned int nr_fixed_rate_clk,
> struct of_device_id *clk_matches);
>
> -extern void samsung_clk_add_lookup(struct clk *clk, unsigned int id);
> +extern void samsung_clk_add_lookup(struct samsung_clk_provider *ctx,
> + struct clk *clk, unsigned int id);
>
> -extern void samsung_clk_register_alias(struct samsung_clock_alias *list,
> - unsigned int nr_clk);
> +extern void samsung_clk_register_alias(struct samsung_clk_provider *ctx,
> + struct samsung_clock_alias *list,
> + unsigned int nr_clk);
> extern void __init samsung_clk_register_fixed_rate(
> - struct samsung_fixed_rate_clock *clk_list, unsigned int nr_clk);
> + struct samsung_clk_provider *ctx,
> + struct samsung_fixed_rate_clock *clk_list,
> + unsigned int nr_clk);
> extern void __init samsung_clk_register_fixed_factor(
> - struct samsung_fixed_factor_clock *list, unsigned int nr_clk);
> -extern void __init samsung_clk_register_mux(struct samsung_mux_clock *clk_list,
> + struct samsung_clk_provider *ctx,
> + struct samsung_fixed_factor_clock *list,
> + unsigned int nr_clk);
> +extern void __init samsung_clk_register_mux(struct samsung_clk_provider *ctx,
> + struct samsung_mux_clock *clk_list,
> unsigned int nr_clk);
> -extern void __init samsung_clk_register_div(struct samsung_div_clock *clk_list,
> +extern void __init samsung_clk_register_div(struct samsung_clk_provider *ctx,
> + struct samsung_div_clock *clk_list,
> unsigned int nr_clk);
> -extern void __init samsung_clk_register_gate(
> +extern void __init samsung_clk_register_gate(struct samsung_clk_provider *ctx,
> struct samsung_gate_clock *clk_list, unsigned int nr_clk);
> -extern void __init samsung_clk_register_pll(struct samsung_pll_clock *pll_list,
> - unsigned int nr_clk, void __iomem *base);
> +extern void __init samsung_clk_register_pll(struct samsung_clk_provider *ctx,
> + struct samsung_pll_clock *pll_list,
> + unsigned int nr_clk, void __iomem *base);
>
> extern unsigned long _get_rate(const char *clk_name);
>
nit: Please keep the indentation consistent in all the function prototypes
above.
Best regards,
Tomasz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
