Hi, On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 1:07 PM, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 12/10/13 00:23, Tomasz Figa wrote: >> >> Hi Kukjin, >> > Hi, > > >> On Monday 25 of November 2013 12:15:08 Mark Brown wrote: >>> >>> From: Mark Brown<broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> >>> Rather than requiring each board to explicitly disable the SPI >>> controllers >>> it is not using instead require boards to enable those that they are >>> using. >>> This is less work overall since normally at most one of the controllers >>> is >>> in use and avoids issues caused by inappropriate pinmuxing. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown<broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> Acked-by: Tomasz Figa<t.figa@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>> --- >>> arch/arm/boot/dts/cros5250-common.dtsi | 9 +-------- >>> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-arndale.dts | 12 ------------ >>> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-smdk5250.dts | 6 ++---- >>> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi | 3 +++ >>> 4 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-) >> >> >> Seems like you have missed this series. Could you apply it? >> > Yeah, thanks for your gentle reminder. > > + Doug and Olof > > BTW, Doug and Olof, are you OK with changing the name of cros5250-common DT > file? Basically, I agree with Mark's patch. I don't see anything that's changing a name, so perhaps I'm confused or missing something. Mark's patch looks good to me so I'll add a reviewed by... -Doug -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
 |