On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 10:44:33AM +0530, Padma Venkat wrote: > This is done in your earlier patch " ASoC: samsung: Ensure DMA data is > initialised for secondary DAI ". Was it done on purpose or by mistake > in this patch? It's intentional - notice that the function has changed, this is why I kept asking you about mainline. Mainline doesn't have the wrapper function that abstracts the difference between s3c-dma and dmaengine, this is why I'm saying these two will need to be rebased on top of the mainline fix. > I think you also told to include a patch for reinitialization of the > dma_data in i2s_hw_params. If you are in the process of debugging some > bug as you mentioned earlier you can ignore this comment. Otherwise it > is just a reminder. Hrm, forgot to commit that bit.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
