Re: [PATCH V11 1/3] ARM: dts: Add pmu sysreg node to exynos5250 and exynos5420 dtsi files

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Tomasz,

On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 10:30 AM, Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> I'd vote for using "pmu-system-registers".  We end up using the
>> "syscon" subsystem but really we're describing pmu registers.
>>
>> I'd even say that you don't need to formally specify the "name" in the
>> bindings (though I'm not up with all the latest device tree
>> requirements).  ...still you'd want to use "pmu-system-registers" in
>> the DTS changes.
>
> Well, since the name should specify the class of device, I would say that
> pmu-system-registers is too specific. If we want to change this, I'd say
> we should go with system-controller.

...but the "compatible" is "samsung,exynos5250-pmu", "syscon", right?
That means that the class of the device is "exynos5250-pmu", right?
It is also compatible with the generic "syscon" class of devices.

> As for name specification inside the binding, I agree that binding should
> not require the main node to be named specifically. If we want to have
> another version anyway, let's drop this.

That sounds good to me.  So drop the "name" part in the bindings file
and then apply this discussion to patch #3 in this series (the one
that touches the .dtsi files).

-Doug
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux SoC Development]     [Linux Rockchip Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux