On Monday 25 November 2013 07:41 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> diff --git a/include/linux/cpufreq.h b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> index dc196bb..6d93f91 100644
> --- a/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> +++ b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> @@ -255,6 +255,9 @@ struct cpufreq_driver {
> int cpufreq_register_driver(struct cpufreq_driver *driver_data);
> int cpufreq_unregister_driver(struct cpufreq_driver *driver_data);
>
> +void cpufreq_suspend(void);
> +void cpufreq_resume(void);
> +
> const char *cpufreq_get_current_driver(void);
>
> static inline void cpufreq_verify_within_limits(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
A minor fix here to get kernel compiled without cpufreq support enabled:
diff --git a/include/linux/cpufreq.h b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
index 8d8b2f4..d40809d 100644
--- a/include/linux/cpufreq.h
+++ b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
@@ -259,9 +259,6 @@ struct cpufreq_driver {
int cpufreq_register_driver(struct cpufreq_driver *driver_data);
int cpufreq_unregister_driver(struct cpufreq_driver *driver_data);
-void cpufreq_suspend(void);
-void cpufreq_resume(void);
-
const char *cpufreq_get_current_driver(void);
static inline void cpufreq_verify_within_limits(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
@@ -287,6 +284,14 @@ cpufreq_verify_within_cpu_limits(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
policy->cpuinfo.max_freq);
}
+#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ
+void cpufreq_suspend(void);
+void cpufreq_resume(void);
+#elif
+static inline void cpufreq_suspend(void) {}
+static inline void cpufreq_resume(void) {}
+#endif
+
/*********************************************************************
* CPUFREQ NOTIFIER INTERFACE *
*********************************************************************/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
