Hi,
On Monday 28 October 2013 08:11 PM, Vivek Gautam wrote:
> Hi Kishon,
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 9:13 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@xxxxxx> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Friday 25 October 2013 07:45 PM, Kamil Debski wrote:
>>> Add support for Exynos 5250. This is work-in-progress commit. Not
>>> for merging.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Kamil Debski <k.debski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/phy/Kconfig | 7 +
>>> drivers/phy/Makefile | 1 +
>>> drivers/phy/phy-exynos-usb.c | 10 +
>>> drivers/phy/phy-exynos-usb.h | 1 +
>>> drivers/phy/phy-exynos5250-usb.c | 411 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> 5 files changed, 430 insertions(+)
>>> create mode 100644 drivers/phy/phy-exynos5250-usb.c
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/phy/Kconfig b/drivers/phy/Kconfig
>>> index 2f7ac0a..0f598d0 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/phy/Kconfig
>>> +++ b/drivers/phy/Kconfig
>>> @@ -36,4 +36,11 @@ config PHY_EXYNOS4212_USB
>>> help
>>> Enable USB PHY support for Exynos 4212
>>>
>>> +config PHY_EXYNOS5250_USB
>>> + bool "Support for Exynos 5250"
>>> + depends on PHY_EXYNOS_USB
>>
>> This should be a separate driver. Not necessary to use PHY_EXYNOS_USB.
>>> + depends on SOC_EXYNOS5250
>>> + help
>>> + Enable USB PHY support for Exynos 5250
>>> +
>>> endmenu
>>> diff --git a/drivers/phy/Makefile b/drivers/phy/Makefile
>>> index ca3dc82..0dff0dd 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/phy/Makefile
>>> +++ b/drivers/phy/Makefile
>>> @@ -6,3 +6,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_GENERIC_PHY) += phy-core.o
>>> obj-$(CONFIG_PHY_EXYNOS_USB) += phy-exynos-usb.o
>>> obj-$(CONFIG_PHY_EXYNOS4210_USB) += phy-exynos4210-usb.o
>>> obj-$(CONFIG_PHY_EXYNOS4212_USB) += phy-exynos4212-usb.o
>>> +obj-$(CONFIG_PHY_EXYNOS5250_USB) += phy-exynos5250-usb.o
>>> diff --git a/drivers/phy/phy-exynos-usb.c b/drivers/phy/phy-exynos-usb.c
>>> index d4a26df..172b774 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/phy/phy-exynos-usb.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/phy/phy-exynos-usb.c
>>> @@ -212,6 +212,10 @@ extern const struct uphy_config exynos4210_uphy_config;
>>> extern const struct uphy_config exynos4212_uphy_config;
>>> #endif
>>>
>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_PHY_EXYNOS5250_USB
>>> +extern const struct uphy_config exynos5250_uphy_config;
>>> +#endif
>>> +
>>> static const struct of_device_id exynos_uphy_of_match[] = {
>>> #ifdef CONFIG_PHY_EXYNOS4210_USB
>>> {
>>> @@ -225,6 +229,12 @@ static const struct of_device_id exynos_uphy_of_match[] = {
>>> .data = &exynos4212_uphy_config,
>>> },
>>> #endif
>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_PHY_EXYNOS5250_USB
>>> + {
>>> + .compatible = "samsung,exynos5250-usbphy",
>>> + .data = &exynos5250_uphy_config,
>>> + },
>>> +#endif
>>> { },
>>> };
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/phy/phy-exynos-usb.h b/drivers/phy/phy-exynos-usb.h
>>> index f45cb3c..a9febfa 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/phy/phy-exynos-usb.h
>>> +++ b/drivers/phy/phy-exynos-usb.h
>>> @@ -42,6 +42,7 @@ enum samsung_cpu_type {
>>> TYPE_S3C64XX,
>>> TYPE_EXYNOS4210,
>>> TYPE_EXYNOS4212,
>>> + TYPE_EXYNOS5250,
>>
>> No cpu types here.
>
> One question here.
> In case we move to single driver for Exynos4 SoCs (4210, 4212 and 4412
> later) as well as S5PV210,
> there will be certain things changing from one SoC to another, how
> should we target that in case we
> don't have CPU types ?
> May be i am misinterpreting your suggestion ?
We should be using the IP revision register or check for compatible values.
Thanks
Kishon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
